To be fair, you did say this:
So, despite the context you outlined, I can't blame others for thinking that you were advocating for the Chinese to respond in English. Just for clarification, you were saying that the Chinese should learn how to clearly understand the intent of the reporters to debate and slap them down no?
Whether Chinese diplomats speak fluent English or not is neither a good or a bad thing. Like I said, I don't have an opinion on the matter even when some of you do -
[...]
Unlike
CMP as he's so keen to react,
I have no personal desire to express my opinion on what foreign language Chinese government officials should or shouldn't learn to speak.
[...]
My reply to you was, again, in the context of the Saudi minister's ability to dress-down the journalist via his proficient command of the English language, which
you presumably wished China would have such ability in their own dealings with foreign journos -
The Chinese foreign ministry as a whole should learn from him. That’s literally how you should deal with those rats.
So if you want to be fair, and at the risk of repeating myself yet again, read exactly what I said in context, the context being if one wishes the Chinese to be like the Saudis,
which they're not, which is a fact,
which includes the manner in which they engage with the press, then be like the Saudis and you'll get the kind of exchanges like you see happening there. That was it, and simple as that.
What I
didn't say was whether they should or shouldn't, yet some of you were quick to get your wires crossed and opine to that effect anyway.
It was as matter-of-fact of an observation as it could get, so I can't believe I have to deconstruct a sentence so agnostic yet seemingly so difficult for some of you to understand, but I hope that's clarification enough, and maybe try not to make a touchy subject out of nothing to begin with...