Miscellaneous News

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
I watched this interview from an Indian TV show about Taiwan with a Chinese expert
of one Professor Steve Tsang (an expat from Hong Kong) who teaches and lead some sort of project that chronicles and studies Pres. Xi Jinping political thought. He's the China expert branded around Britain. In the interest of researching his background to understand his motivation, his background, education, and wealth etc..in order for me to understand what propels him to do what he does (which is attack China and the CPC) in terms of his analysis and analyzing the country he once professed to idealized.

So in the process, I came across this Yahoo interview that was conducted last year, and here on this interview is where I found the answer to his disillusionment of China, socialism, and his never ending quest of trying to bring the party down. I copied and pasted the portion the interview where he talked about his experience of China during his "rebellious phase" a.k.a. too young, too naïve phase.

Quartz: How has your upbringing in Hong Kong influenced your China scholarship?

Tsang:
I grew up in Hong Kong and made my first trip to China in 1978 as an undergraduate at the University in Hong Kong. I was very keen to go because I wanted to know what “mother China” was like [during] the end of the Maoist era and the beginning of the Deng Xiaoping era. I was 19 or 20, I was rebellious, and Hong Kong was a [colony]. So even though there was no particular reason why I would be anti-colonial, I was anti-colonial for the hell of it.

One week of exploration was a total eye opener. I spent about a week or so in China, and that was a big eye opener. In those days, you had to physically get out of the trains in Lon Wu in Hong Kong, walk across Lon Wu Bridge into the Chinese side, and then get on a train in Shenzhen. I couldn’t wait. When the train rolled out of Shenzhen towards Canton, I was looking out of the windows trying to catch sight of everything I could.

By the end of that week, when I returned to Shenzhen to cross the border, and I saw the union flag, and the Hong Kong policemen in British khaki, I thought, ‘This is where I belong.’ One week of exploration was a total eye opener.

Why? What happened during that week?

Tsang:
There were [many] experiences. [I was] having some noodles in the noodle shop and there were kids, big ones in their teens and little ones, outside, looking at us eating noodles. It was incredibly uncomfortable. They were pointing at their mouth and rubbing their tummy—’hungry.’ So I pulled out a yuan note and I gave it to the oldest girl, who was in her teens, and said to her, ‘Go buy some food and share it with everybody.’ She grabbed the money and started running. I was so angry. I chased her, took the money back, and then gave it to the little ones and said, ‘Take the money together, go get some food, and share it equally.’

I went back to China for socialism. And what I saw was utter poverty, children starving, and they were behaving in a very selfish way. I was expecting idealism and that wasn’t what I was seeing.

Then we went to Guilin and we wanted to go up the river Li to Yangshuo, this beautiful spot. The staff said, ‘We queue up in the morning at the pier, get our ticket, and go in the boat.’ I wanted to do what the locals do. So I bought the Mao suit, and the green tennis shoes, and we got onto the lower deck [of the boat]. All the tourists, foreigners and Hong Kong people were in the upper deck. So what’s in the upper deck? I wanted to go up and see. I tried to go—’No. Upper decks are for foreigners and Hong Kong or Macao compatriots. You lot stay down there.’

How did that make you feel?

Tsang:
That, to me, was bringing back the myth of the Shanghai parks in the 1920s, ‘No dogs or Chinese,’ which was supposedly overthrown by the Communist Party 1. Events like that completely destroy the idealism of a young man about the propaganda of the modernizing China that was coming out of the Maoist era.

Your description of desperate and starving children in Shenzhen—that sounds like the China of the 1970s, not the China of 2021. Do you feel differently about the Chinese government, now that it has brought 800 million people out of extreme poverty?

Tsang:
As an undergraduate in Hong Kong, I carried a Little Red Book of Chairman Mao’s Quotations. It was not part of the curriculum but I would go and buy it. I immersed myself in all the Party’s propaganda about China. I believed in what the party was talking about. That’s why I went to China. And they were lies. That was the problem. The problem wasn’t the poverty, or the behavior of the children, or the behavior of the people on the boat.

The economic miracle in China in the last 40 years was totally real. When I first went to China, it was no better than North Korea today. Shanghai, in some ways, is now comparable in your material life and convenience to Manhattan in New York. You can’t say that China has not made enormous progress there. But it doesn’t matter. That has never been the point for me.

So the point for you was that the system that was being advertised to you was not the system on the ground?

Tsang: It’s the untruthfulness of it
.
So he's unhappy with China today because 40 years ago it was poor despite being advertised as socialist.
Does he hold any other country to this standard? South Korea was as poor as China 50 years ago. How about India today compared to how it advertises itself?

The reasons why China was poor was the same reason Hong Kong wasn't, western imperialism. He wasn't looking for idealism, he was a champagne socialist who didn't want to get out of his comfort zone.

Now he's just a stubborn old man who refuses to admit he was wrong.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
So he's unhappy with China today because 40 years ago it was poor despite being advertised as socialist.
Does he hold any other country to this standard? South Korea was as poor as China 50 years ago. How about India today compared to how it advertises itself?

The reasons why China was poor was the same reason Hong Kong wasn't, western imperialism. He wasn't looking for idealism, he was a champagne socialist who didn't want to get out of his comfort zone.

Now he's just a stubborn old man who refuses to admit he was wrong.
By his logic, if he went to the city with the highest GDP, in the country with the highest living standards in the world - NYC, USA, he should find 0 homeless people or poor people, otherwise liberal democracy is a sham. Does he wanna take this bet?

"During the stone age, nobody was homeless, yet a modern system cannot deliver what even stone age tribes could?"
 

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
The overreaction is indicative of how Aust beef exports still rely on the China market... aussies are starting to realize that cow-worshipping JaiHindistan and poverty-stricken Japan can't replace China.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

GT Voice: Australia’s overreaction to rumor on imports reflects guilty conscience

By Global Times Published: Aug 17, 2022 08:45 PM

An online rumor about an impending Chinese ban on agricultural imports, particularly meat, from Australia and New Zealand due to concerns about foot and mouth disease posted by a Chinese social media account has sparked widespread concerns in Australia - a clear reflection of Australia's guilty conscience over its mistake in undermining China-Australia ties.

The rumor, which first surfaced late Sunday, attracted lots of attention from Australian media outlets as Australian beef exporters are reportedly on high alert. Even Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Tuesday that China had no basis for using foot and mouth disease to suspend beef imports.

Judging from the information from all sides, there is a clear overreaction to a mere market rumor from the Australian side. Chinese customs authorities haven't issued any formal notification. Shipments of meat from both Australia and New Zealand are currently being cleared as normal. Even the Chinese WeChat account that posted the rumor said on Monday that the customs clearance for Australian farm goods, including meat and dairy, was back to normal.

Indeed, the source of the rumor itself is an unofficial report and has never been verified by any Chinese official. To a certain extent, the irrational attention and hype over mere hearsay is reflective of the lingering market anxiety about China-Australia economic and trade relationship, which has been under the shadow of the political tension between the two countries for some time.

With China-Australia relations recently showing certain positive signs of thawing, bilateral economic and trade ties are at a sensitive stage. At this juncture, while market uncertainties and concerns are understandable, relevant business communities and market players are advised to wait for official information or seek confirmation from official sources instead of being easily swayed by unreliable rumors to avoid unnecessary market panic.

It should be noted that Albanese on Tuesday also took the opportunity to call on China to withdraw existing trade restrictions on Australian commodities, including wine, coal and barley. While it may reflect Australia's eagerness to see the so-called trade restrictions lifted by China, from another perspective it also indicates the lack of political willingness to address fundamental issues impacting China-Australia economic and trade relations. Since taking office, Albanese has been setting the preconditions for improved bilateral relations, saying the so-called Chinese economic sanctions must be lifted.

Yet, the difficulties facing the current China-Australia economic and trade relations are the result of political tensions. It is Australia's former Morrison administration that has joined the US-led containment campaign against China and taken the initiative to adopt policies showing its hostility toward China. Given Canberra's diplomatic strategy that framed China as a hostile target, how can bilateral economic relations remain smooth and unaffected?

This is also why the market has been so easily stirred up by a rumor about trade ban this time. The root cause lies in politics, not economics. In fact, it is the complementary nature of the two economies as well as their trade exchanges over the years that have still steered bilateral trade from being derailed despite the freeze in bilateral political relations.

But if Australia doesn't change its China policy starting from political and diplomatic levels, anxieties and concerns will continue to haunt the market.

We hope the Australian side can take concrete actions to improve bilateral relations, instead of trying to shirk responsibility and put pressure on China, which is not the right way for any improvement in bilateral trade ties.
 

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
What losing the mandate of heaven looks like:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

More than two decades of well below average rainfall have left the river - the lifeblood of the western US - at critical levels, as human-caused climate change worsens the natural drought cycle.

Despite years of warnings and a deadline imposed by Washington, states that depend on the river have not managed to agree on a plan to cut their usage, and on Tuesday, the federal government said it was stepping in.

"In order to avoid a catastrophic collapse of the Colorado River System and a future of uncertainty and conflict, water use in the Basin must be reduced," said Tanya Trujillo, assistant secretary for water and science at the US Interior Department.

Arizona's allocation from the river will fall by 21 percent in 2023, while Nevada will get 8 percent less. Mexico's allotment will drop by 7 percent.

In other news:
1660791670960.png
 

solarz

Brigadier

The U.S. accused a Chinese MIT professor of spying. Now cleared, he helped discover what may be the ‘best semiconductor material ever found’​


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Is incredible that this guy still want to keep contributing after being treated like a second class citizen in the U.S.

Nobody make discoveries on their own. Advanced scientific research needs a highly talented team, and discoveries benefit everyone. Science has no borders.
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think China should still watch out when reciprocating investment to EU though. The nations friendlier to China should get bulk of the investments.
- Serbia
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Sweden (complicated)
- Italy
- Spain
- Greece
- Portugal
- Poland (complicated, plus low quality noobs)
- Croatia

This is how you upset the balance of EU. F*** the Northwestern European economic dominance.
 
Top