Miscellaneous News

AF-1

AF-1

Junior Member
Registered Member
Actually this war made clear that any military engagement between 2 most powerful countries in the world would be a total disaster for whole world in economic way, and i doubt any country is willing to handle that burden. This actually decreased chances of us/cn war in any level.
Current military spending is still smart, having on mind that huge portion of defense budget still goes to R&D, to develop world class weapons and equipment. Producing huge amount of expensive equipment that is not yet on required level of development (imagine production of huge series of early variants of J-15 or Y-20...) would be total waste of recourses.
 
O

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
AF-1 said:
Producing huge amount of expensive equipment that is not yet on required level of development
Click to expand...
Waste or not will only be proven if after 10 years no war has happened.

If a war happened, then you wished that you had decided to "waste" more money. You would be banging your head on the wall for not "wasting" more money

If a war didn't happen, then you actually successfully deterred your enemy, or you admit that you wasted some resources. But who cares, at least you survived and became a superpower with a powerful military. Seems like a good trade off to me

AF-1 said:
Producing huge amount of expensive equipment that is not yet on required level of development (imagine production of huge series of early variants of J-15 or Y-20...) would be total waste of recourses.
Click to expand...
I am talking about today. This means increase hypersonics production, expand PLARF, 052, 055, J-20, Y-20, increase munition stock (PLAGF, PLAN, PLAAF), submarines (still waiting for that mass production even with the new facilities done)

Plenty of areas where you can throw your money around and I haven't even started talking about massively increasing R&D which can easily eat all the money you throw at it.
 
O

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Another prediction correct. This US-instigated coup was always going to bring disaster to Pakistan


A firesale of state assets and natural resources is going to happen in Pakistan. Totally a patriotic government and military.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In a desperate attempt to save the country from default through emergency sale of state’s assets to foreign countries, the federal cabinet has approved an ordinance to bypass all the procedures for the process and also abolished regulatory checks including the applicability of six relevant laws.
Click to expand...
President Arif Alvi has not signed the ordinance yet. The government has also barred the courts of the country not to entertain any petition against the sale of assets and shares of the government companies to foreign countries, as per the ordinance.
Click to expand...
The federal cabinet had approved the ordinance on Thursday to sell stakes of oil and gas companies and government-owned power plants to the UAE to raise $2 billion to $2.5 billion to avoid the looming default.
Click to expand...
Finance Minister Miftah Ismail had said this week that it usually took 471 days to complete one privatisation transaction. He had added that the government had to conclude deals with foreign countries in days to urgently raise funds.
Click to expand...
A well-run country

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has placed a condition that Pakistan’s case could not be taken to the board until it arranged $4 billion from friendly countries to bridge the financing gap.
Click to expand...
IMF "friendly countries"
 
H

henrik

Senior Member
Registered Member
Overbom said:
Waste or not will only be proven if after 10 years no war has happened.

If a war happened, then you wished that you had decided to "waste" more money. You would be banging your head on the wall for not "wasting" more money

If a war didn't happen, then you actually successfully deterred your enemy, or you admit that you wasted some resources. But who cares, at least you survived and became a superpower with a powerful military. Seems like a good trade off to me


I am talking about today. This means increase hypersonics production, expand PLARF, 052, 055, J-20, Y-20, increase munition stock (PLAGF, PLAN, PLAAF), submarines (still waiting for that mass production even with the new facilities done)

Plenty of areas where you can throw your money around and I haven't even started talking about massively increasing R&D which can easily eat all the money you throw at it.
Click to expand...
It is nice to see the Chinese has agreed on faster production of CV, type 075, type 076, and various fighters like J-10, J-16 and J-20 to about 150 per year.
 
M

monterrey

Just Hatched
Registered Member
bd popeye said:
Post only news articles in this thread. No discussion. You may express your opinion over the article you post only. Find another forum for political discussion.

bd popeye super moderator

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
Latest InFlow Generation - State of the Art Novel InFlow Tech: ·1-Gearturbine Rotary Turbo Reaction Turbine, ·2-Imploturbocompressor 1 Compression Step Impulse Turbine

Gearturbine Lateral Cut Technical Draw.jpg

·1-Gearturbine: Reaction Turbine, ·Rotary-Turbo, Similar System of the Aeolipilie ·Heron Steam Device from 10-70 AD, ·With Retrodynamic = DextroGiro/RPM VS LevoGiro/InFlow, + ·Ying Yang Circular Power Type, ·Non Waste Parasitic Power Looses Type, ·8-X,Y Thermodynamic Cycle Way Steps, Patent: #197187 / IMPI - MX.

Imploturbocompressor front cut.jpg

·2-Imploturbocompressor: Impulse Turbine, ·Implo-Ducted, One Moving Part System Excellence Design, · InFlow Goes from Macro-Flow to Micro-Flow by Implosion/And Inverse, ·One Compression Step, ·Circular Dynamic Motion. Implosion Way Type, ·Same Nature of a Hurricane Satellite View.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



:p

:rolleyes:
 
bajingan

bajingan

Senior Member
Overbom said:
Waste or not will only be proven if after 10 years no war has happened.

If a war happened, then you wished that you had decided to "waste" more money. You would be banging your head on the wall for not "wasting" more money

If a war didn't happen, then you actually successfully deterred your enemy, or you admit that you wasted some resources. But who cares, at least you survived and became a superpower with a powerful military. Seems like a good trade off to me


I am talking about today. This means increase hypersonics production, expand PLARF, 052, 055, J-20, Y-20, increase munition stock (PLAGF, PLAN, PLAAF), submarines (still waiting for that mass production even with the new facilities done)

Plenty of areas where you can throw your money around and I haven't even started talking about massively increasing R&D which can easily eat all the money you throw at it.
Click to expand...
I honestly think the only area that China should throw their money around, is NUKES conventional weaponry won't deter the us, nukes will
the us still talk about China like she is iraq, they casually talk about bombing Chinese ports, infrastructures and industries, they never talk like that about russia, and you all know why
China should build'em like sausages
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top