That's why, in real life, Russia imported 70% of its technological goods from China, before the Ukraine War even started.It looks like he gave some lectures to Chinese students and they are claiming that there were "state secrets" there, lol. I guess that's what happens when you don't pay your scientists a competitive wage, most of your equipment is old (some straight-up Soviet crap) and rusting while the primary source of income is government grants which are plagued by corruption at both the government and research institute levels.
China gifts Zimbabwe a modern Parliament
India is buying huge amount of Russian goods, Turkey took over the market Europeans leave(car components and etc), Israel banned weapon supplies to UKR and there are Jews from Soviet Union in Israel who actually support Russia , far as I can tell, none of them is standing with UKRIndia, Israel, Turkey are far more important countries in terms of diaspora power and they will get even more influence after this Ukraine is done. It is these three countries action or inactions that make things happen.
I just dont think Indonesia, Brazil, Nigeria can influence EU/US to same extent.
You are mistaken with face values versus fundamentals on independence of countries. Here is the general pecking order:India, Israel, Turkey are far more important countries in terms of diaspora power and they will get even more influence after this Ukraine is done. It is these three countries action or inactions that make things happen.
I just dont think Indonesia, Brazil, Nigeria can influence EU/US to same extent.
I see you are a fan of Liu Cixin's Three Body seriesAmericans throw out hyperbole charges to get people on the defensive where they have to prove they're not doing it. That's why don't believe when they say they believe in innocent until proven guilty. That's only to make themselves look so civilized when it's really the opposite because the whole point is to get people to bend over backward to prove that's not the case and that usually comes in the form of blind obedience. If you are not blindly obedient then you must be planning to do what is charged. Bill Nelson has made comments worried over China's plans for space. This is the way to get China to have to divulge something that is not required to but the US wants to know and then force China into submitting to what the US demands which is yielding to the US in space.
I'm writing a story where in the future an alien civilization is visited by Americans for the first time because some American long ago bought their star in one of those star registry services and they're there to claim the planet as theirs.
I think Turkey have potential to become (2) tier country. They can do it if they combine the Arab world and west&middle Asia resources.You are mistaken with face values versus fundamentals on independence of countries. Here is the general pecking order:
(1) Self-sufficient independent countries
They are fundamentally independent of political, economical, cultural, military and geopolitical domains. There are only 3 such countries in the world today: US, China, Russia.
(2) Largely independent countries
Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria.
Each of them is sufficiently independent in its neighborhood. None of them has permanent foreign military based inside its sovereign.
Brazil is the core of South America.
Indonesia is the core of ASEAN.
Nigeria is the core of Africa.
(3) France
France is a unique country. It could be (1) or (2) if it were not a NATO/EU country.
(4) Quasi-independent countries
EU countries, NATO countries (except US), 5-eye countries, Japan, Korea.
(5) India
India is unique. It is culturally British. It is emotionally American. It cannot get over Pakistan and behave like a major power. It cannot get over China and behave like a grown-up country. India's top 100 million people are world class. Yet they are the same elite people who are extremely and apically illusional in geopolitics. It wants to play a swing role between US, Russia and China. Because of that, none of major powers takes India seriously. Everybody just wants to have a piece of it one way or another. Give me an example in that India has played a leading role or a deciding role in an international even in the past 30 years or so.
(6) Israel
Israel would have been a small country in the muslim world if it were not a client state of US.
The story of the current war actually re-enforces my theory. The west (plus 5-eye and Japan and Korea) is totally united under the US flag. India is trying to play both ways. But the west openly admits that it is only China that would make or break Russia in the current war. As long as the west does not crush Russia, this structure of the world goes on.
Last and least, forget about Turkey. It situates in a great geological spot. That is it, no more, no less. In front of the big 3, Turkey is nobody. In comparison with the (2) tier, Turkey a quasi-client state of the west. The so-called turkic world is as illusional as Indian dream of hegemony inside Asia.
how can Brazil/Indonesia/Nigeria stand a chance against growing influence of Israel/India/ Turkey after Ukraine.You are mistaken with face values versus fundamentals on independence of countries. Here is the general pecking order:
(1) Self-sufficient independent countries
They are fundamentally independent of political, economical, cultural, military and geopolitical domains. There are only 3 such countries in the world today: US, China, Russia.
(2) Largely independent countries
Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria.
Each of them is sufficiently independent in its neighborhood. None of them has permanent foreign military based inside its sovereign.
Brazil is the core of South America.
Indonesia is the core of ASEAN.
Nigeria is the core of Africa.
(3) France
France is a unique country. It could be (1) or (2) if it were not a NATO/EU country.
(4) Quasi-independent countries
EU countries, NATO countries (except US), 5-eye countries, Japan, Korea.
(5) India
India is unique. It is culturally British. It is emotionally American. It cannot get over Pakistan and behave like a major power. It cannot get over China and behave like a grown-up country. India's top 100 million people are world class. Yet they are the same elite people who are extremely and apically illusional in geopolitics. It wants to play a swing role between US, Russia and China. Because of that, none of major powers takes India seriously. Everybody just wants to have a piece of it one way or another. Give me an example in that India has played a leading role or a deciding role in an international even in the past 30 years or so.
(6) Israel
Israel would have been a small country in the muslim world if it were not a client state of US.
The story of the current war actually re-enforces my theory. The west (plus 5-eye and Japan and Korea) is totally united under the US flag. India is trying to play both ways. But the west openly admits that it is only China that would make or break Russia in the current war. As long as the west does not crush Russia, this structure of the world goes on.
Last and least, forget about Turkey. It situates in a great geological spot. That is it, no more, no less. In front of the big 3, Turkey is nobody. In comparison with the (2) tier, Turkey a quasi-client state of the west. The so-called turkic world is as illusional as Indian dream of hegemony inside Asia.
Turkey is not an Arab country. In the muslim world, the pecking order is likely:I think Turkey have potential to become (2) tier country. They can do it if they combine the Arab world and west&middle Asia resources.