We should not call them pinpricks. We know the consequences of failing against hegemonic, hyperagressive and ultra-militaristic polities by looking at history.
Last edited:
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
But this is indeed a pinprick, their provocation on military and political front doesn't really mean much. Their organizations like NATO and EU is proven to be nothing but a way to compromise the economic and military sovereignty or security of its members, its just a way to gain influence in those countries, they didn't dare run into a direct conflict with Russia, and is yet to be successful at destroying Russia economically or politically.
In the end, the greatest threat to China comes from within, as long as the leadership is competent, passing sound policies, guiding the economy properly and maintaining domestic stability, they should be able to weather the turbulence in this decade. I do think the leadership is wise enough to know what provocation to react to and the proportionate response to it. Besides, all these salami-slicing would be all overturned, if it really comes down to an armed reunification.
@Coalescence correct bro the greatest enemy is within and Xi did good in cleansing the Party of blocs and cliques. And both China and Russia is fortunate to have strong leaders at the time of extreme adversity.
Rubbish tip near Delhi on fire.
Rubbish tip feels inadequate, it's more like a small mountain.
Rubbish tip feels inadequate, it's more like a small mountain.
Damn the temperature increase from climate change is starting to affect them badly now, I hope no one got caught in that fire. Do they need to evacuate nearby settlements from the possible toxic smoke coming out of that landfill?
plawolf
Lieutenant General
Notice how this fuck is still active on Twitter after literally and explicitly supporting terrorism.
Anyone who harbour any delusions about western ‘rules based order’ should really wake up.
Not in the same way Russia does with the U.S. though.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
So...? What it's called is money they need in other areas now has to be allocated to support Lithuania industries. How does that hurt or go against China? If the EU had endless amounts of money, they along with the US would break all relations with China but the don't because they'll feel the pain and lose more money they don't have to spend.
