I think I read it here when, someone pointed out that SEATO had already been created with a similar function when it was suggested that Nato should establish a presence in Asia.
Last edited:
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Hypocrisy that is what it is, f**king hypocrisy, that is why most of the world do not take the Western outcry about Russia seriously.
LOL...China can't make friends, aren't allowed to sign any security Pact/deals with it's neighbors because that would be seen, interpreted as a "threat" to regional peace. Yet, the Americans and it's vassals are allowed to station their militaries around China, make deals with China's neighbors to cause trouble while China isn't even allowed to raise concerns legitimate or not.
This is the kind of news that is very irksome to read because it reeks of extreme double standards not to mention the obvious intentions of white countries to dictate China on what it can and can't do. Despite this fact, a lot of western leaning Hanjians don't see any issues with this.
No NATO country was ever expected to do any heavy lifting against the USSR. Even at the lowest point of the cold war European military spending was much lower than American.
An Asian NATO would be the same as the European version. A paper tiger that served as a gateway to American military bases,, arms sales and political hegemony.
SEATO went kaput due to North Vietnam defeating the South (while CENTO failed due to overthrow of Iraqi monarchy); SEA countries know full well that Uncle Sam wants them to do the fighting and dying for them, which is why no SEATO replacement ever appeared.
World is literally going to hell with starvation, lack of energy, civil and external strife and all some people care about is whether they have global dominance. What is the point of such dominance if there isn't a world left to inherit?
solarz
Brigadier
They don't care about the world, they only care about their own interests.
Which is why these people are eventually going to hang in the end
The types in power right now are all old and greedy, brought up from a bygone era of decadence and prosperity, now depraved for a taste of that sweet life before they passed on from this world. All the talks of making the world a better place and a better future for the next generation is nothing but one of many façade they use to hide their atrocious acts. In truth, has there ever been a leader for a nation that looks out for the interest of the world and all the people who lived in it?
We're still stuck the the thinking that defines us by our borders, ideology, race and gender. In the field of technology and science, we have advanced so far, but in social, cultural and political fields, our progress seems to be still stuck back in 15th century, with only incremental and aesthetic changes. But it will change, these technologies are making us rethink our ethics and morals, opening up new mechanisms for political and social management, our behaviors and lifestyle in the next few decades will be completely different from what we have now.
There won’t be any interests left. Do they not see that?