Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Of course they exaggerated the foreign interference angle. That's not even the worst of the mistakes that Imran Khan made in his tenure. Allying with people like Tareen/Aleem/Buzdar were much bigger mistakes.
But the fact is this: For all the mistakes that PTI made, your only alternative right now is the fuckin PDM. If crooks like Nawaz/Zardari/Diesel return in power, they will reverse Pakistan's development by a decade.
The idea that the only people supporting PTI right now are 'cult' followers is ridiculous. The majority of his support are people who simply hate the alternative. IK and PTI is far from perfect, but at least the direction and intention is correct. The PDM don't even pretend to have the right direction. Their whole platform is literally based on open looting and patronage.
Last edited:
There is not a single country on this planet right now that can "protect itself from US interference," including China.
You think there is no US interference in Hong Kong or Xinjiang? What planet are you living on?
So slow your roll.
So they are exporting spiny lobsters to the US while the Chinese buy Maine Lobsters?
Is there a politician in Pakistan actually called "Diesel"?
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
So? Are Westerners swayed by what the Chinese say? No, it has the opposite effect. If it's anonymously done without identifying China behind it, if it's swaying anyone, then it's a reasonable point that makes people think. This is where the West exposes its racism just because it's from a Chinese, they think it's automictically not valid. The West claims they're for free speech meaning anyone can debate and speak what they believe. This shows how they don't believe in it.
I know I upset a lot of people with what I say in forums like these. That's intentional not because I'm violating rules that everyone has to follow. It's because I'm not talking to them like they're the ones that I have to convince. I'm talking to Chinese hoping to give Chinese an alternative perspective that they might not be seeing. They don't control that. They want to make everyone believe that convincing them is most important. They don't even understand what democracy is all about when they think what I have to say has to be cleared by them first before I can say it. I even have Chinese critics that don't like my approach. They tell me that I have to be responsible in what I have to say because to them only people in authority should be in that position. Everyone Chinese that dares to tell me that are only thinking they don't want me upsetting Westerners because then Westerners might treat them badly because of what I say. They're admitting Westerners are racist if they're worried they'll get punished for what I have to say. It's ironic because all the Asians that hide behind the West's championing human rights are so quick to deny it from other Asians. I don't see myself as an authority. I see myself as only one person out of how many billions on the internet? And they want to stifle one person because it's not in line with what narrative they want out there.
I've mentioned this before that one time I was in a car full of guys where I was the only non-white. We were driving by the UC Berkeley campus and passed by two Asians talking to one another on the sidewalk. One of the guys must've forgot I was in the car because he just openly said he didn't like seeing two Asians talking to one another by themselves like he was with like-minded people who thought like that too like it was a commonly held belief talked about in private circles. Why was "English only" a big deal in the US? It's not because they believed everyone speaking a common language makes America function smoothly. That was the just the cover story. You talk to regular people and they think when more than two people are speaking in another language around them, it's because they're being talked about negatively behind their backs or it's a conspiracy against the US because why else would they be not speaking English unless it was for hiding something.
You can see why they're so touchy when it comes up to what someone on the other side of the world is saying. And this is free speech...? Like I've said before, the only reason why they make themselves the champion of this or that like with human rights is not because they're protecting it. It's because they want to control what is and what is not a human rights violations protecting themselves when they violate human rights. And they really want to violate free speech around the world.
Last edited:
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Said the country accusing China of genocide... It just goes to show how they know they're lying about genocide on the Uighurs if they're even asking this question. If China is committing a genocide, why would they care about a massacre going on in another country? Maybe because they're talking about "cultural genocide" which the West is notorious for doing and wanting to do now by turning everyone into "good little Christians."
Is there a politician in Pakistan actually called "Diesel"?
Is he related to Vin?