I think sanctions + breaching Taiwan's airspace. If it is only sanctions, it would look too weak of a responsePersonally I think sanctions are most likely.
I think sanctions + breaching Taiwan's airspace. If it is only sanctions, it would look too weak of a responsePersonally I think sanctions are most likely.
Correct, this is why I said previously, the other moves are likely going to be behind the scenes, and not very open to the public. The responses must be measured and not self-defeating.Sanctions is likely just a starting point because this visit is high ranking official.
Also another thing to note is that the Western Public believe China is a paper tiger and if China doesn’t response accordingly.
Their own voters will pressure the politicians to make ever more bolder moves.
WFT, this doesn't even have a point; it doesn't have a coherent reason for being said. It's not a negotiation because Russia's not there and it's not an actionable idea because it gives the other side absolutely no reason to sell. It's just an old person rambling on what her imaginary ideal would be. It's like a dude going to the supermarket speaking to nobody in particular going, "I should be able to buy all the food I want, eat it everyday, and then, instead of paying Kroger, I pay my mother. And then she uses the money to fix her car. Yeah, we should do that." And the manager and staff are just running around looking for this clearly mentally disabled person's caretaker. This is what a lot of US politicians have devolved into because they can't cope with China's rise and they don't know how to deal with Russia's bravado.
A mansion frequented by Marilyn Monroe and Humphrey Bogart was bought by a real estate developer working for BLM founder Patrisse Cullors and her partner for $3.1 million, and then purchased by BLM's foundation just six days later for $5.8 million in cash, it has emerged.
It was my doom and gloom response or describing a worst case scenario that could unfold. Not my personal wish to for things like that to occur for the world let alone for China to experience.Damn, calm down. It won't escalate to such a worse case scenario like you're describing. The responses to this provocation must be measured, with minimal damage to China unlike the Europeans destroying their own economy through they own sanctions. Even if China doesn't have an immediate response, they could go on offensive later, escalating their responses and pushing US to sign an agreement with clauses that forces them to concretely support the One China principle and retract all of their initiatives aimed at China. Similarly to what Russia have done with Ukraine, and seeing the reactions I don't think other countries would see it as a weakness and dare to touch on the redlines like US is doing.
I understand why you're anxious, I was too as well before, but after connecting the dots from multiple sources, China is far from a sitting duck that the Western media like to portray. The responses should be measured and not self-destructive.
Elegantly expressed. The fact that this idea got even an article or thought in the decision making by the higher ups exposes that either they are either deluded or desperate, could be both as well. We tend to overestimate these folk's strategic acumen, but I guess being over paranoid and cautious of them is still recommended to keep our senses sharp and focused.WFT, this doesn't even have a point; it doesn't have a coherent reason for being said. It's not a negotiation because Russia's not there and it's not an actionable idea because it gives the other side absolutely no reason to sell. It's just an old person rambling on what her imaginary ideal would be. It's like a dude going to the supermarket speaking to nobody in particular going, "I should be able to buy all the food I want, eat it everyday, and then, instead of paying Kroger, I pay my mother. And then she uses the money to fix her car. Yeah, we should do that." And the manager and staff are just running around looking for this retarded person's caretaker. This is what a lot of Us politicians have devolved into because they can't cope with China's rise and they don't know how to deal with Russia's bravado.
The only ones who believes Biden are the diehard democrats. Plus I did say as per the article paraphrasing Biden lies again.
That is an option but IMO it has to be visible to the average civilian. These people have been smoking 500 grams per day of 110% ultra pure copium for the last few years. They won’t believe it unless they can watch it. Otherwise, they will convince themselves that “fly by” is fake news and that bolder action most be taken in exchange for losing Ukraine.
Then I'm glad you got that out of the system. Personally, the worst case scenario for me in the current context is US/EU deluding themselves that a nuclear war is winnable, when they see that they are losing to China/Russia. All the other scenarios have many variables and decisions that can be taken to avert/negate the negative effects, or even completely turn the situation back on itself altogether.It was my doom and gloom response or describing a worst case scenario that could unfold. Not my personal wish to for things like that to occur for the world let alone for China to experience.
I don't care if the world ends because that means every single being dies. Big whoop. Americans are hell bent on dying then so should the Chinese. They want to meet their Jesus that much, then China ought to help them hasten their date with their maker.Then I'm glad you got that out of the system. Personally, the worst case scenario for me in the current context is US/EU deluding themselves that a nuclear war is winnable, when they see that they are losing to China/Russia. All the other scenarios have many variables and decisions that can be taken to avert/negate the negative effects, or even completely turn the situation back on itself altogether.
A nuclear war doesn't, when a nuke falls, it will be the end of us all. and it doesn't take much, just a click of a button, then our entire world ends.