“Serious Risk of Genocide” = No Genocide.
They basically admitted there is no genocide just like that shitty UK tribunal of alleged genocidal intent + no evidence of mass killing = genocide.
Last edited:
US admiral ready to ‘fight and win’ if China deterrence fails
The US Navy commander accused China of the ‘largest military buildup since World War II’
A US Navy commander has warned that the US will be prepared to “fight and win” in a war against China should “deterrence” prove unsuccessful in the Indo-Pacific amid claims Beijing is “militarizing” in the region.
US Indo-Pacific commander Adm. John C. Aquilino said in an interview with the Associated Press published on Sunday that over the past two decades China had been conducting “the largest military buildup since World War II” and that their “buildup of weaponization is destabilizing to the region.”
Aquilino claimed that while the US military’s mission is to allegedly “prevent war” in the region – the Pentagon would be ready to fight and win in a conflict against China.
Aquilino has accused China of militarizing islands in the disputed South China Sea and turning them into fortresses with anti-aircraft and anti-naval weaponry. The admiral called it a part of China’s wider effort to “expand the offensive capability of the PRC beyond their continental shores,” and claimed Beijing would use the islands to fly fighter jets and bombers during a potential conflict.
Your foundation is wrong. And it is not your fault. In fact, the people who went through formal education in curriculums based on the narrative of the Western Academia are all misled by their own bias, and thus unable to understand why this happens.
The truth is, communism is against "capitalism", but "capitalism" does NOT mean capitalism (as understood by the West). The West understood every modern currency-based economic activity/behavior as capitalist. But Communism in the Eastern Tradition have a much much narrower and specific definition for "capitalism".
In fact, Elon Musk is NOT a "capitalist" by Chinese standard. He is viewed as an "Industrialist". "Capitalist" by Chinese communist standards are bankers and financiers. In this respect, China has always been very very cautious, suspicious and untrusting with what they really consider as "capitalists", giving them much much more restrictions. You don't hear nearly as much stories of foreign investment bank's huge success in China. In fact, the only foreign person/entity of the "capitalist" (bankers and financiers) category who can be considered to have a little bit of success in China is James Beeland Rogers Jr. and Warren Buffett.
@FriedButter bro is that a sign of desperation or a hubris self confidence, IF you're bluffing Beijing then prepare to be disappointed and ready for a fight, all these bellicose remark only stiffen the Chinese resolved.
InshallahLong live Chairman Mao!
@Crang Nah! non of the participant are at Schumacher level except for the son though...lol