Which resulted in pages after pages of irrelevant stuff and the thread got canned....
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Which resulted in pages after pages of irrelevant stuff and the thread got canned....
Do you, also, argue with 6 year olds?
Tho’ many, here, aren’t familiar with Biblical proverbs, it’s understood that y’all might not know the saying that “in an argument between a wise man and a fool, there will be no peace”. But, I’m sure there must be an ancient Chinese equivalent!
Additionally, an expert communicator not only understands a expression's content, but also its intent. Recognizing, that some intended only to disinform, disrupt, and dominate, the expert communicator would choose not to accommodate those intentions, but to avoid/ignore the content intended to achieve such ends.
So, the question is: when a commercial comes on, or an ad pops-up (for the youngsters in here), and particularly for those commercials or ads one has, already, seen, do you attend to them, or do you ignore, block, or hide them?
Last edited:
We have a modern one "Don't argue with fools because they will drag you to their level and beat you with their experience"
When China was briefed, they would have said more than "Russia is going to invade Ukraine". Chinese would have asked for proof, and lots of it. That could be anything from satellite photographs, intercepted communications, insider information.
Then if/when China passed on something to Russia, there are a number of ways the Anglos could have found out. They could have intercepted communications, insider information, or some other source. Or Russia could have changed something like an encryption code or software/hardware platform. There are other ways.
They could just be making it all up, but then China would just deny it. If it's true then they will privately be giving evidence that they know.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
And the US thinks if they can get some other country to torture people for them, it means the US didn't violate human rights. By that logic China is not responsible nor obliged to the US to let the US know what it knows.
I don't argue to change trolls' opinions. I argue so these trolls don't manage to convince other people with their propaganda.
Example: we have Sleepy's alts coming here every 2 or so weeks saying the same stuff but we still argue with him because we don't want unaware people to fall for his idiotic beliefs
Every troll must be resolutely countered in order to keep this forum filled with high-quality content.
Example: Pro-US people don't bother me as long as they honestly admit that they want their country, the US, to keep its Hegemony by fighting/keeping down China. Now if they come here and try to preach us with their "holier than thou" attitude and with Gordon Chang's propaganda about China's upcoming collapse, then they deserve to be mocked and treated as trolls
Last edited:
The West doesn't equal the World. Asian nations have their own interests and value. Exception: South Korea, Japan, Australia and Singapore.
TBH. It’s possible that only a selective few higher ups knew that something may happen but not the details of it. Putin and Xi did have a face to face meeting less then a month ago. Who knows what was privately said
As such, you’re still trying to convince. Instead, you might allow other reviewers reach their own conclusions based upon a, hopefully, comprehensive reviewing of all posts relevant to the particular topic.
However, it’s not my place to persuade you, either. So, as I failed in the Ukraine thread, I won’t re-enforce that failure, here! That’s immature strategy!