Miscellaneous News

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yeah so?

Which one did the US get more upset? That Putin didn't join with Five Eyes in diplomatically boycotting the Beijing Winter Olympics or how Xi didn't join with the West in shunning Putin meeting with him during the Beijing Olympics? It's like how China has to be hypocritical and help them following their sanctions on other countries while they sanction China at the same time. They're so arrogant that they expect China to help undermine China or they've been wronged. They claim they're for sovereignty until it interferes with what they want and then it becomes imperialism. All it takes is just for them is to just say it and that's enough and their word is as good as gold. They think they can hide behind democracy and human rights in punishing China, but then when China retaliates in kind, they act like China fired the first shot. They instigate but if you retaliate in just the same way, you're the aggressor. And why is that? Because they're doing it for human rights and democracy while you're not and they act like they're innocent little blonde girls in their best Sunday dresses that could not possibly do anything wrong.
 

Arnies

Junior Member
Registered Member
I would not call that an alliance.

Russia and China too, they are not an alliance.

What they are, they are partners.

Words are important. Alliances convey the message of exclusivity, because in the end, a military alliance is directed at someone else.

Being partner, well, anyone can be a partner.

:)


That is why, the country of India, is so strange.

India is not a member of any alliance in any real sense. Then on the other hand, India is not a partner of anyone else in international affairs.
The US knows Pakistan can shake the entire picture in Asia in favor of Russia and they aren't just useless Indian cannon fodders but a cunning player in the continent that has far reaching influence outside of its borders. D.C will do everyting it can to keep Pakistan into neutral position..

Pakistan technically liberated half of Europe from soviets all the way to half of Germany it was held by USSR. The US knows the expertise of Pakistan and cunningness
 

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
i interpret this as India is such a shithole that the indians would rather try to get immigration status from a war than return to india; also, indian males sexually harassing blonde haired, blue eyed white females is a common occurence in the west and ukraine being of the Rus, has no shortage of the latter.
 

Arnies

Junior Member
Registered Member

Document confirms US told Russia NATO won’t expand​

“We made it clear to the Soviet Union – in the 2+4 talks, as well as in other negotiations – that we do not intend to benefit from the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Eastern Europe,” the document quotes US Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and Canada Raymond Seitz.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
great find
 

Arnies

Junior Member
Registered Member
with all due respect, we would have to see tiangong in 2040 to have a fair comparison. Although, I'm fairly certain tiangong will be deorbited and have at least one successor generation (if not two) by then.

Why 2040 tho?
 

Helius

Senior Member
Registered Member
with all due respect, we would have to see tiangong in 2040 to have a fair comparison. Although, I'm fairly certain tiangong will be deorbited and have at least one successor generation (if not two) by then.
Heh, when China thinks 20 years is too long to run a space station for.

Why 2040 tho?
It's what the ISS looks like after 20 years.

Fact is, the current Tiangong has a mission lifespan of 10 years. So it probably won't even be up for as long as the ISS itself, which has now been pushed to 2030.
 
Last edited:

CasualObserver

Junior Member
Registered Member
Top