Japan sees preemptive airstrikes as ‘self-defense’
Preemptive Nuclear bombardment seen as self defense should be the reply to Japan from China.
Japan sees preemptive airstrikes as ‘self-defense’
They are asking Asians to be model citizens and brainwashing Asians to make sacrifice.You’ve basically summed up the “Global White Privilege” theory.
A few points…
I don’t think entertainment is the only way minorities can succeed in America, I think it is simply the most common way. Don’t forget that the Civil Rights act was only passed in 1965, which meant many black people in Southern states were shut out of good education until recently.
The attitude that you are observing is simply a reflection of today’s political climate in my opinion. Back in the 70’s, many Black American activists greatly admired China like Malcolm X or Huey Newton. However, as black politicians entered the mainstream, they had to adopt those mainstream views or never get elected.
I look at the praise they keep heaping on Naomi Osaka every time she mentions Peng Shuhai, vs. The vitriol poured onto the “sellout” Lebron James. It’s a joke. Why shouldn’t he care about making money in China? Money is power after all.
Also, if Chinese people didn’t value entertainment, they wouldn’t have an entertainment industry. So that statement is not strictly true. Rather, education is of paramount importance, and anything else isn’t reliable.
This is exactly why I think the US is at a higher risk for civil war within the next couple decades.They are asking Asians to be model citizens and brainwashing Asians to make sacrifice.
So Japan seeks to go down the path of WW2 and trying to work their magic like that did during WW2 with an army of Meidos and Otaku and Salary men/women what haven't had proper sleep in years. They must seriously want to experience what has happened in Nanjing on their own soil if they think they can even dare to try and make China their bitch again because by the time China is done, their fake Samurai spirit will be left in a state so broken that even humpty dumpty would be considered mendable in comparison.
Preemptive Nuclear bombardment seen as self defense should be the reply to Japan from China.
We are laughing because this is the Financial Times and the UK. The people writing that crap are the same folks who were laughing at how China would succumb to its aging population. Or how China would succumb to Covid-19. What Financial Times write is a reflection of the thinking of those elitist bankers. Let them advise the UK govt to just let old people die, just to save some pounds. The UK is so fond of crusading about human rights around the world. Yet they failed to see the irony of what they are doing to their own people. Eventually, the UK people will find out what the hell is going on. Then it is up to them after that. To keep business as usual, or to finally stand up against their elitist system.Why are people laughing at this? They are basically celebrating the fact that "useless old people" are dying so their government could save a pound. I fail to see what is so humorous about the situation. If anything, you should be sad and frightened.
Virtue signalling is an exorbitant privilege by those who can afford it ie white females and white males of the elite classes; virtue signalling by an asian like this, is simply an expression of self interest in a social climbing opportunist.They are asking Asians to be model citizens and brainwashing Asians to make sacrifice.
Nabuo Kishi, the current Defence Minister and brother of former PM, Shinzo Abe. He, unlike his brother adopted his mother's family name: Kishi. His maternal side grandfather is none other than Nobusuke Kishi, AKA: "Monster of the Showa era". Infamous for his brutal rule of Manchuria in the 1930s to WWII. He is a Class A war criminal who spent only little time in jail, and became PM of Japan in 1957.
Preemptive Nuclear bombardment seen as self defense should be the reply to Japan from China.
Intellectual cowardice or not, one country is standing tall, reaching almost superpower status and the other is in ruins. When it comes in geopolitics there is no such thing as cowardice or bravery.I could easily argue that your “covered from all angles” strategy is simply an intellectual rationalization of cowardice.
The Chinese don't value entertainment as a career. Oh yes entertainment is the only path where minorities are allowed to succeed and make lots so money. Like I said in its nature, there can only be a few at a time and success is dependent on if people like you or not not how good you are. Any other prestigious career that requires intellect they question if you got there through affirmative action.You’ve basically summed up the “Global White Privilege” theory.
A few points…
I don’t think entertainment is the only way minorities can succeed in America, I think it is simply the most common way. Don’t forget that the Civil Rights act was only passed in 1965, which meant many black people in Southern states were shut out of good education until recently.
The attitude that you are observing is simply a reflection of today’s political climate in my opinion. Back in the 70’s, many Black American activists greatly admired China like Malcolm X or Huey Newton. However, as black politicians entered the mainstream, they had to adopt those mainstream views or never get elected.
I look at the praise they keep heaping on Naomi Osaka every time she mentions Peng Shuhai, vs. The vitriol poured onto the “sellout” Lebron James. It’s a joke. Why shouldn’t he care about making money in China? Money is power after all.
Also, if Chinese people didn’t value entertainment, they wouldn’t have an entertainment industry. So that statement is not strictly true. Rather, education is of paramount importance, and anything else isn’t reliable.