Somehow the recommendation of attracting global talent can benefit China gets interpreted as “China can’t innovate due to lack of freedom” lol.
Global talent. It is a too wide and loose definition. It's easily distorted.
Example: In construction engineering. China is the most built country in the world, China has countless skilled workers, experienced engineers, many excellent students, with many universities with the world's leading training programs.
1. It creates a problem. Excellent students, experienced engineers, foreign skilled workers ... do not benefit China. In many cases, the so-called outstanding and experiences of foreigners are often backward and do not meet China's standards.
- It's like excellent students in computer science at an African university will be considered a global talent. He can work well in native nation, in regional countries, and most countries around the world. But it may not be effective if working in countries like US or China. I'm not sure he can apply for a large corporation like Google, Microsoft, Tencent, Alibaba ..
-We can lower the standards down, but China and the US do not lack normal employees.
2. Just assume they are capable, but why China must accept them. Each of them in China, means a student, engineer, indigenous workers without jobs.
Highly skilled workers -> China has a lot -> no need
Experienced engineers -> China has a lot -> no need
3. If they are a certain genius, is it really China indispensable them and must invite them at all prices? Don't forget what I said before:
No one is irreplaceable.
Nothing is irreplaceable.
EG- Look at the IT field
-United States has Larry Page and Sergey Brin, China has Yanhong Li
- United States has Bezos, China has Jack Ma
The same thing also expanded many other areas.