I think your whole take is foolish and dangerous. The US specifically abandoned Afghanistan/Kurds to shift to confronting China. A majority of Americans want to defend Taiwan and it's only increasing. The US won't let China win in the largest point of contention with it so easily.Only 40% of Taiwanese believe America will defend it (the lowest amongst supposed "US Allies"), so how is your estimate even more optimistic than Taiwanese themselves, who are regularly fed bullshit US propaganda too?
If Trump or another crazy Republican was in charge, the best case scenario is 50/50. If it's Biden, he would 80-90% chance he blame Taiwan for low morale/cowardice, and slap some token sanctions on China and call it a day.
It's based on US refusal to sell Taiwan it's most modern weaponry: F-35 that it reserves for Israel/NATO/Korea/Japan. Taiwan is not a real ally, based on action, not talk.
It's also based on TRA's strategic ambiguity words, which allows US to opt out of defense if the situation changes, like balance of power tilts away from US favor.
It's based on US regular abandonment of "US allies" when the costs overweights the benefits (Afghanistan and South Vietnam).
1941? China wasn't even born yet, still in Civil War/Foreign Invasion/Occupation.
1962? China didn't even have nuclear bombs yet. Maybe nuclear weapons is an important factor in whether US would intervene.
1950? China was piss-poor and military backwards then (yet still stalemated US). If anything, the experience of stalemating Korea led to US inaction in Vietnam (refusal to cross the 17th parallels into North Vietnam for fear of Chinese intervention a la Korea) which ultimately lead to US and South Vietnamese defeat. And that's against a backward-ass/poor China. The modernization of Chinese military has increased so much that the balance of power is firmly in China's favor now on conflicts at it's coastline/door step.
US will abandon Taiwan just like it abandoned the Kurds, Afghanistan, and South Vietnamese because the Costs outweighs the Benefits.
If the calculus is that China can go in and unite the ROC without consideration to the US, as if it didn't exist, then it indeed is foolish. However, there is a high likelihood, almost guaranteed, in fact, that the US will not intervene if China adequately prepares for it. Failing to prepare is preparing to fail, and China is preparing very well for US intervention, as it has been the core philosophy of China's military drive since 1996. There is a huge chance that the US will intervene if it believes it has a high chance of success, and that confidence will be bolstered if it believes that failing a conventional victory, escalation to nuclear warfare will grant it the win; but China is countering that right now with the fastest conventional military drive in the world and a renewed nuclear weapons building spree (eversince DF-41 and DF-ZF were ready). So to properly prepare, China has to build itself to a point where the US can see that it has an unaccepatbly low chance to win a conventional conflict, and then if it were to escalate beyond that by either losing side, China can deal it MAD. Once those things are met, China will have adequately prepared for the US and the US will not be able to intervene, except to complain and shriek about sanctions. We are getting closer there by the day; perhaps already there, who knows, but China is always doing more for good measure and more to reach the next level at which even the Taiwanese, with their distorted views of Western worship, can see that there's no hope of anyone (successfully) helping them and that the only way forward is to unify and become one with the newly minted most powerful nation in the world. (Pride will likely overwhelm them as they didn't know it was so fulfilling to stand up with a spine and declare one's own power as compared to licking foreign boots and rooting for others as a sidekick/cheerleader.) Once we reach this second stage, there will be very little reason holding Beijing back from making the much-anticipated move and it could very well be far less dramatic and satisfying than we had all hoped.I think your whole take is foolish and dangerous. The US specifically abandoned Afghanistan/Kurds to shift to confronting China. A majority of Americans want to defend Taiwan and it's only increasing. The US won't let China win in the largest point of contention with it so easily.
A more interesting question is concrete ways/scenarios in which a US intervention in Taiwan can escalate past the nuclear level. I believe one likely scenario is US first use after devastating conventional losses.
Just yesterday, during the meeting between Turkish FM and Chinese FM Wang Yi. Wang made the following statement to Turkish side.Alot of assumptions being thrown around here I don't see why Turkey wanna be involved in this and damage a trade partner and a friend like that it doesn't make sense and a country they have invested in.. The same with Israel.. The only culprit is the US to divert Russia from East Europe that was the initial plan to create another like Afghan blackhole but this didn't materialize because the protest just never escalated to that level
I am sure this is just a coincidence..Xi has made clear early on to support Kazakhstan's position, few days later the Turks visited China, then you hear this harsh "demands" from China. If you connect all these dots together, it is clear that not only Russia and Kazakhstan lay the blame on Turkey, but China too.
Huh? How so?China and the US are the two sides of the same coin.
I have no idea that "feminism" is a contentious issue in S.Korea. i don't know if this tension is a natural product brought about by modernization or more assiduously the adoption of western prcepts that can sometimes create an adverserial relationship in a society like South Korea.
Here on this video, it's stated that the radical feminist have produced ads that essentially demeans and stereotypes Korean/Asian men's genital size..
Just yesterday, during the meeting between Turkish FM and Chinese FM Wang Yi. Wang made the following statement to Turkish side.
在同恰武什奥卢会谈时,王毅表示,我们要按照两国元首确定的方向,推动两国关系获得健康稳定的发展。一是支持彼此维护好本国的主权、安全和发展利益;二是恪守互不干涉内政这一国际关系基本准则;三是不在国际场合参加针对对方的活动;四是在历史、民族等认知差异问题上,通过双边渠道加强沟通,增进相互了解
At this point I'm going to call it: Lithuania will do a backflip on the Taiwan Representative Office thing. If not this year from political crisis then next year in their general election. Lots of entertainment shell be enjoyed by us here at that time, with lots of weeping and gnashing of teeth from the west.
But more interestingly what sort of geopolitical implication would a Lithuanian backflip have? It will cause further damage to US image of course, but would it be enough to cause a rout in pro-US political factions in say South Korea and Japan?