Miscellaneous News

clockwork

Junior Member
Registered Member
Only 40% of Taiwanese believe America will defend it (the lowest amongst supposed "US Allies"), so how is your estimate even more optimistic than Taiwanese themselves, who are regularly fed bullshit US propaganda too?

If Trump or another crazy Republican was in charge, the best case scenario is 50/50. If it's Biden, he would 80-90% chance he blame Taiwan for low morale/cowardice, and slap some token sanctions on China and call it a day.


It's based on US refusal to sell Taiwan it's most modern weaponry: F-35 that it reserves for Israel/NATO/Korea/Japan. Taiwan is not a real ally, based on action, not talk.

It's also based on TRA's strategic ambiguity words, which allows US to opt out of defense if the situation changes, like balance of power tilts away from US favor.

It's based on US regular abandonment of "US allies" when the costs overweights the benefits (Afghanistan and South Vietnam).


1941? China wasn't even born yet, still in Civil War/Foreign Invasion/Occupation.

1962? China didn't even have nuclear bombs yet. Maybe nuclear weapons is an important factor in whether US would intervene.

1950? China was piss-poor and military backwards then (yet still stalemated US). If anything, the experience of stalemating Korea led to US inaction in Vietnam (refusal to cross the 17th parallels into North Vietnam for fear of Chinese intervention a la Korea) which ultimately lead to US and South Vietnamese defeat. And that's against a backward-ass/poor China. The modernization of Chinese military has increased so much that the balance of power is firmly in China's favor now on conflicts at it's coastline/door step.

US will abandon Taiwan just like it abandoned the Kurds, Afghanistan, and South Vietnamese because the Costs outweighs the Benefits.
I think your whole take is foolish and dangerous. The US specifically abandoned Afghanistan/Kurds to shift to confronting China. A majority of Americans want to defend Taiwan and it's only increasing. The US won't let China win in the largest point of contention with it so easily.

A more interesting question is concrete ways/scenarios in which a US intervention in Taiwan can escalate past the nuclear level. I believe one likely scenario is US first use after devastating conventional losses.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I think your whole take is foolish and dangerous. The US specifically abandoned Afghanistan/Kurds to shift to confronting China. A majority of Americans want to defend Taiwan and it's only increasing. The US won't let China win in the largest point of contention with it so easily.

A more interesting question is concrete ways/scenarios in which a US intervention in Taiwan can escalate past the nuclear level. I believe one likely scenario is US first use after devastating conventional losses.
If the calculus is that China can go in and unite the ROC without consideration to the US, as if it didn't exist, then it indeed is foolish. However, there is a high likelihood, almost guaranteed, in fact, that the US will not intervene if China adequately prepares for it. Failing to prepare is preparing to fail, and China is preparing very well for US intervention, as it has been the core philosophy of China's military drive since 1996. There is a huge chance that the US will intervene if it believes it has a high chance of success, and that confidence will be bolstered if it believes that failing a conventional victory, escalation to nuclear warfare will grant it the win; but China is countering that right now with the fastest conventional military drive in the world and a renewed nuclear weapons building spree (eversince DF-41 and DF-ZF were ready). So to properly prepare, China has to build itself to a point where the US can see that it has an unaccepatbly low chance to win a conventional conflict, and then if it were to escalate beyond that by either losing side, China can deal it MAD. Once those things are met, China will have adequately prepared for the US and the US will not be able to intervene, except to complain and shriek about sanctions. We are getting closer there by the day; perhaps already there, who knows, but China is always doing more for good measure and more to reach the next level at which even the Taiwanese, with their distorted views of Western worship, can see that there's no hope of anyone (successfully) helping them and that the only way forward is to unify and become one with the newly minted most powerful nation in the world. (Pride will likely overwhelm them as they didn't know it was so fulfilling to stand up with a spine and declare one's own power as compared to licking foreign boots and rooting for others as a sidekick/cheerleader.) Once we reach this second stage, there will be very little reason holding Beijing back from making the much-anticipated move and it could very well be far less dramatic and satisfying than we had all hoped.
 
Last edited:

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Alot of assumptions being thrown around here I don't see why Turkey wanna be involved in this and damage a trade partner and a friend like that it doesn't make sense and a country they have invested in.. The same with Israel.. The only culprit is the US to divert Russia from East Europe that was the initial plan to create another like Afghan blackhole but this didn't materialize because the protest just never escalated to that level
Just yesterday, during the meeting between Turkish FM and Chinese FM Wang Yi. Wang made the following statement to Turkish side.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
在同恰武什奥卢会谈时,王毅表示,我们要按照两国元首确定的方向,推动两国关系获得健康稳定的发展。一是支持彼此维护好本国的主权、安全和发展利益;二是恪守互不干涉内政这一国际关系基本准则;三是不在国际场合参加针对对方的活动;四是在历史、民族等认知差异问题上,通过双边渠道加强沟通,增进相互了解。
  1. supporting each others effort to safeguard sovereignty, security and interest.
  2. uphold the principle of non interference of domestic affairs.
  3. do not take actions against one another.
  4. on the matter of different history and ethnic identity, improve understanding by dialog.
Although the talk is bilateral, but they are principles that apply to all other countries. Two countries on good terms would never make these subjects as the only talking points in a high profile visit. When these points are openly put forward, the relation is bad, it is almost act as accusation, especially thinking about the closeness of events.

Xi has made clear early on to support Kazakhstan's position, few days later the Turks visited China, then you hear this harsh "demands" from China. If you connect all these dots together, it is clear that not only Russia and Kazakhstan lay the blame on Turkey, but China too.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Xi has made clear early on to support Kazakhstan's position, few days later the Turks visited China, then you hear this harsh "demands" from China. If you connect all these dots together, it is clear that not only Russia and Kazakhstan lay the blame on Turkey, but China too.
I am sure this is just a coincidence..
Rumors are flying everywhere that Turkey is going to re-enter the F-35 program
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That's why I have been calling Turkey a snake for so long. And as always, snakes should be hunted on a "shoot-on-sight" basis
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
I have no idea that "feminism" is a contentious issue in S.Korea. i don't know if this tension is a natural product brought about by modernization or more assiduously the adoption of western prcepts that can sometimes create an adverserial relationship in a society like South Korea.

Here on this video, it's stated that the radical feminist have produced ads that essentially demeans and stereotypes Korean/Asian men's genital size..

 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
I have no idea that "feminism" is a contentious issue in S.Korea. i don't know if this tension is a natural product brought about by modernization or more assiduously the adoption of western prcepts that can sometimes create an adverserial relationship in a society like South Korea.

Here on this video, it's stated that the radical feminist have produced ads that essentially demeans and stereotypes Korean/Asian men's genital size..


Bubba feminists want privilege when it is to their benefit and equality when it isn't.
 

Arnies

Junior Member
Registered Member
Just yesterday, during the meeting between Turkish FM and Chinese FM Wang Yi. Wang made the following statement to Turkish side.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
在同恰武什奥卢会谈时,王毅表示,我们要按照两国元首确定的方向,推动两国关系获得健康稳定的发展。一是支持彼此维护好本国的主权、安全和发展利益;二是恪守互不干涉内政这一国际关系基本准则;三是不在国际场合参加针对对方的活动;四是在历史、民族等认知差异问题上,通过双边渠道加强沟通,增进相互了解

This is not factual bro and i will explain to you why...

Turkey was relieved and happy to see Tokavey crush the protestors immediately and Kazakhstan retains stability.. They have to many investment there and companies they could have lost alot of money with turmoil..

Besides Tokayev and Nursultan have both good relations with Turkey and they had no side to pick..

Kazakhstan nor Russia has laid any blames on Turkey but that part is an inside gossip assumption on twitter like many other candidates thrown around like Israel, US, China etc etc..

But the real culprit is the US and they wanted to trap Russia into a Vietnam like conflict diverting them away from Ukraine but the protestors just died down within 2 days and never reached that far hence the intended plan failed.. Russia understood this immediately that it was a diverting tactics making there resolve on Ukraine stronger since that diverting tactics didn't materialize
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
At this point I'm going to call it: Lithuania will do a backflip on the Taiwan Representative Office thing. If not this year from political crisis then next year in their general election. Lots of entertainment shell be enjoyed by us here at that time, with lots of weeping and gnashing of teeth from the west.

But more interestingly what sort of geopolitical implication would a Lithuanian backflip have? It will cause further damage to US image of course, but would it be enough to cause a rout in pro-US political factions in say South Korea and Japan?

What the United States is doing is kind of dumb.

They want to de-emphasize their strategic concerns in other parts of the world, so that they can focus more on the Ind-Pacific, their label, because they view China is the main adversary.

After this stated objectives of who to confront, then all the dumb stuff starts to happen.

What happens? In the Middle East, countries there sense the Americans are losing interest in the region, and Arab nations all significantly upgrade their relations with China. A key motivator there is Huawei, because their 5G gear represents a way out for them to lessen their dependence on fossil fuels. In short, America on the way out, China on the way in.

What happens? In Europe, Russia is at odds with some elements. China has Russia's back in case of any Western sanctions. In short, America on the way out, Russia on the way in.

What happens? In East Asia and Southeast Asia, they signed the RCEP and the One Belt One Road in going strong. In short, America on the outside looking at it, China is in a central position in all of that.

With the BRI, we can make similar observations regarding South America, and Africa.

What was Lithuania all about? I honestly don't know.

Looked like some sort of fight, but in the end, it was another mini-crisis in Europe.

The larger point it seems here, is perception.

Such as which way is this going?

We can look at a country any country, see strengths and weaknesses, numbers, blah blah blah.

Those metrics are only one part of the story, the other part is perception in that given those metrics, is the place going up or going down?

Clearly here, the perception of the United States is they are on the way out, because they said themselves they do not want to be there like before, such as the Middle East and Europe, because they want to confront China.

Therefore, the Americans are on the way out, in some places in the world, but in Asia, the Americans are not exactly ascending on their way in, because of RCEP and BRI.

What we are looking at, is American isolation. If President Trump returns, we may expect more of that.

Lithuania seems like one of two things. 1) butt hurt over losing Nicaragua from Taiwan to China so use Lithuania to compensate, or, 2) a tail wag the dog manipulation of the EU.

I think Lithuania does play some role in the context of American power and its ability to shape events.

What they are trying to attempt here, is unknown.

That to me is the real problem. They cannot go around trying anything and everything. It makes it look like they have no clue and no chance to take on China.

The US and pro-US factions, they look beat and isolated.
 
Top