Miscellaneous News

Kaeshmiri

Junior Member
Registered Member

Biden signs Xinjiang forced-labour bill into law​

  • Ban on imports from Xinjiang will go into effect in June, with disruptions to the global supply chain likely
  • Law creates a “rebuttable presumption” that all goods sourced wholly or in part in Xinjiang are tainted by the use of forced labour in their production
US President
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
signed into law on Thursday a measure that will effectively ban all imports from China’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Uygur autonomous region, a move likely to have significant ramifications for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
s and global supply chains alike.

In a brief statement, Biden thanked Congressional leaders and the bill’s authors for their “leadership” on the overwhelmingly bipartisan legislation, but he did not host a signing ceremony as presidents sometimes do with high-profile bills.

nacting the bill signalled the Biden administration’s commitment to “combating forced labour, including in the context of the ongoing genocide in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
”, said US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, referring to an official determination by the government that Beijing’s actions in the region constitute crimes against humanity.

Blinken praised the “new tools” provided by the legislation to both counter forced labour in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and to “further promote accountability for persons and entities responsible for these abuses.”

The new law creates a “rebuttable presumption” that all goods sourced wholly or in part in Xinjiang are tainted by the use of forced labour in their production – charges that Beijing denies. The ban will go into effect in June.

Once the ban is in place, companies will be able to appeal the prohibition only if they can provide “clear and convincing evidence” that their supply chains are free of the involvement of forced labour.

Experts say that standard will be close to impossible to meet, given the inability of independent auditors to gain unrestricted access to the region.

The law also directs the US government to sanction any individual in China deemed responsible for rights abuses related to forced labour.

The new law adds to growing international scrutiny of China’s policies in Xinjiang, dovetailing with criticism of the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games in Beijing in two months; the US and other allies are refusing to send officials in protest.

“As the Chinese government tries to whitewash their genocide and claim a propaganda victory with the upcoming Olympics, this legislation sends a powerful, bipartisan message that the United States will not turn a blind eye,” Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon, the bill’s lead Democratic sponsor in the Senate, said on Thursday.

The move to ban all Xinjiang imports follows a spate of US government actions to punish China over its policies in the region, including sanctions against officials, blacklisting of numerous Chinese companies, and other trade measures.

Senator Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican who was the bill’s author, called its signing into law the “most important and impactful action” taken by the US to combat forced labour in China to date. “It will fundamentally change our relationship with Beijing.”

The ban is an outlier among US import restrictions, which typically limit goods based on specific product types or individual suppliers, rather than entire regions.

The import ban will “reverberate through global cotton and solar markets”, researchers at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE) wrote.
Xinjiang is a dominant player in international supply chains of cotton; polysilicon, a material critical to the production of solar panels; and agricultural goods like tomatoes.

Even with existing federal restrictions on cotton and tomato imports from Xinjiang, exports from the region to the US more than doubled in the first quarter of 2021 to some US$64 million. That figure does not account for goods shipped to the US from other locations that use raw materials sourced in Xinjiang.

While the bill was a “constructive move”, the PIIE researchers noted that it would not address new allegations of forced transfer of Uygur labourers out of Xinjiang to other parts of China.

And while rights advocates have hailed the law as a valuable tool to crack down on suspected forced labour, they stress that its efficacy will hinge on the rigour with which the US Customs and Border Protection agency enforces it.

CBP has six months to develop an enforcement strategy, and during that time, a federal task force on forced labour will hold hearings and seek public comment on how best to prevent goods involving Xinjiang from entering the US.

China has assailed the legislation as a case of “economic bullying” under the pretence of human rights and has vowed countermeasures, but has yet to indicate what form any retaliation might take.

Previous US efforts to hold Beijing accountable for human rights abuses have seen the Chinese government respond with sanctions on individual lawmakers and congressional bodies.
The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the bill’s enactment.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Non-paywall

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Ban on an entire region in China? China should also respond with banning all imports from few US states like South Carolina, Alaska, Washington etc (States whose top export destination is China). China should claim use of prison labour (which is actually true) while doing so.
Countering US propaganda this way will put America on the backfoot as it will be forced to defend such unethical programs . This way US wont be allowed to control the narrative here and its own weapon of Human Rights will be used against it.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
You have to ask what did China achieve after shattering USSR-Vietnamese encirclement effort, and salami-annexation of Nam Quan Gate..... China got an unruly, ungrateful, cunt neighbor that is constantly trying to play China and West off each other, but ATLEAST Vietnam respects China's redlines about encirclement/containment alliances and proved untrustworthiness of USSR (even US) to intervene to defend Vietnam. So yea, China didn't get much material gain/concession,
Vietnam was always like that if you read the history. It is one of the only two countries within China's tributary system whose monarch was secretly styled as emperor at home, the other was Japan. So don't expect they are going to change to anything else.

but the symbolism of China's intervention reverberates throughout Southeast Asia today.
That is China's purpose. One doesn't get respect by always being the nice guy. Showing the teeth every now and than will prevent others from crossing the line. China did that to US in the 1950s for the same reason. It is better for people to avoid a war out of fear than daring to enter a war.

Also "through Southeast Asia" is a far stretch. How many SE countries every had a war with China in the history? By war I don't count some fights between villagers over the border. I tell you, only Vietnam and Myanmar (1765-1769). China had overall good relationships with all the rest in the past thousand years.
 
Last edited:

antiterror13

Brigadier
Good conservation gentlemen, recommend this book if you haven't already read it.

Add a few more points:

1. Deng needed a "small war" to whip the PLA into shape, which he knew had major issues and low morale after the Cultural Revolution. And also he needed a war for his own political purposes, as he was still in the process of consolidating his power.
2. Further to the quasi-alliance with the USA, Deng needed US/Western capital and tech to launch his main goal - economic reforms.
3. After the main ceasefire, there was continuous skirmishes which put Vietnam under massive economic pressure (they were preparing for another PLA assault), essentially Vietnam lost the entire decade of the 1980s due to focusing on the border at a time when its economy and industries were weak.

Vietnam was thus neutralised, and basically surrendered in 1988, pulling all troops from Cambodia; the new VNese leadership pressed for peace with Beijing so it could focus instead on economic reforms, having witnessed the early results of China's reforms.

View attachment 80291

I have read the book a few months ago, excellent book and easy read. You will understand how brilliant Deng was

Anybody interested of pdf version? ping me
 
Top