Miscellaneous News

DarkStar

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is as much an attack on the weaboos who populate the Asia Society and the Pottinger's who infest the State Department and CIA who have a raging hate boner against China.

You know the type, the beta white male who, just because he spent a month on exchange in japan is now an Asia Expert and connoisseur of the ways of the Orient.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
A question for everybody.

Have you ever heard a diplomat calling the country they were posted at, saying that those people are mo-fo-ing racist?

Lu Shaye said that in Canada when he was posted here.

Cui Tiankai is saying that after his post in the United States.

It would appear that China is going to take them on, on everything and anything, including race.

This is going to be funny.

According to political correctness, it is not about race.

China is going to shove that in their faces. CCP is not a political party that believes in virtual signalling.

The CCP can be cynical and nasty.

Make it about race, and the popularity of CCP will go straight through the roof.

Somethings, you just don't touch, you know what I mean. Stay clear of Chairman Mao, do not provoke those teachings, it will never end, lol.

:D
 
Last edited:

DarkStar

Junior Member
Registered Member
A question for everybody.

Have you ever heard a diplomat calling the country they were posted at, saying that those people are mo-fo-ing racist?

Lu Shaye said that in Canada when he was posted here.

Cui Tiankai is saying that after his post in the United States.

It would appear that China is going to take them on, on everything and anything, including race.

This is going to be funny.

According to political correctness, it is not about race.

China is going to shove that in their faces. CCP is not a political party that believes in virtual signalling.

The CCP can be cynical and nasty.

Make it about race, and the popularity of CCP will go straight through the roof.

Somethings, you just don't touch, you know what I mean. Stay clear of Chairman Mao, do not provoke those teachings, it will never end, lol.

:D
i'd say that the CPC is following an age old tradition of meritocracy, as opposed to the race based caste system that certain into-european races still possess eg india and the anglosphere.

The third rail of white anglo societies is that it is a society built on racial supremacy and a racial caste system, but to point it out is certainly not de rigeur in what anglos calls 'polite society'. They'd much rather persist with the rainbow coloured fantasy even as they and their political classes live behind gated communities protected by armed guards.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I am so sick of China and the rest of East Asia being the dumping ground for the mental illnesses and autism of white people.

china is far more civilised as a society than the shit that produces BAE and the sexpats that infest Asia
I don't think autism is related to this. It doesn't turn someone into BAE. She is hugely bitter and seems to have a personal vendetta against Chinese.

I'm just surprised that BAE accuses all Chinese men of patriarchy... And marries a Middle Eastern guy?

I mean she wants to use statistical arguments to be a racist against Chinese men but I wonder what she thinks of WM who do the same with Middle Easterners?
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Chairman Mao, he famously wanted to export his revolution.

Chairman Mao wanted the the Third World, or developing world, to unite to overthrow Imperialism.

Make it about race, and we can hear the echo of Chairman Mao's teachings loud and clear.

Of course, times change.

Instead of revolution, it is now all about development. The CCP, all they want is a win-win situation.

It is not about race.

If they want to make it about race, then is about development in the Third World with the race question, and all that historical baggage that contains.

That's why we refrain from talking about politics in the forum. It could quickly escalate to another President Trump wrestling match, like WestleMania-23.

:oops:
 

bajingan

Senior Member
Always a pleasure to hear these moderate and clear eyed voices from China's governing elites. nothing about the future is certain. everyone can screw up and everyone has the capacity to improve. It's the country that work the hardest to produce, prepare, and reflect that will build a tiny advantage every year and develop a small lead in the long run.

No Chinese should dream of a Chinese empire of the old days as the international environment has complete changed. For example China's monumental lead over the likes of Japan happened in the context of mutual isolation before Tang. The leap was diminished even with new isolation with what they learned. Nowadays, everyone can readily copy everyone else in every domain (as long as you are willing).

But I do think China has many advantages:
1) an incomprehensively large common market
2) an out of this world geography for economic development, being laterally 'the middle.' US geographic advantage is in military only.
3) a meritocratic one party system ensures relatively moderate political views
4) a hybrid state-market economy blend efficiency and fairness, which I think is vital in the future with AI and automation.
5) a balanced culture of individualism (vs Japan) and collective responsibility (vs the US)
6) a well defined and reasonable national objective, that is directly improving Chinese people's lives.

of course things can still go wrong in China but I really like China's set of pros and cons. As long as China stay humble and open to learn from everyone, I can't imagine China lose.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I kinda disagree with this ex-deputy chief of Party History Research Centre
the us was able to bounce back from decline in the past because it was able to rob and loot other industrialized countries via unequal treaties

plaza accord was one of those treaty, after japan signed that economic surrender her gdp growth was only 1.1% for decades in contrast the us experienced a decade of extraordinary recovery in growth rates in 1990s
The us enjoyed accelerated employment, productivity and wage growth, as well as faster investment and consumption growth in the later 1990s, while japan experienced lost decades

Now the us is facing another industrialized superpower nation (with a larger gdp ppp) that in contrary to japan refused to sign economic surrender plaza accord 2.0

How will the us bounce back from decline if it can't "harvest" China? So far the answer is not encouraging
They can't even agree to sign $1.9t infrastructure plan build back better which is vital for their own interest, political polarization is such that now msm openly talked about incoming civil war as soon as 2024

A parasyte cannot survive if it unable to find a host to consume
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
I kinda disagree with this ex-deputy chief of Party History Research Centre
the us was able to bounce back from decline in the past because it was able to rob and loot other industrialized countries via unequal treaties

plaza accord was one of those treaty, after japan signed that economic surrender her gdp growth was only 1.1% for decades in contrast the us experienced a decade of extraordinary recovery in growth rates in 1990s
The us enjoyed accelerated employment, productivity and wage growth, as well as faster investment and consumption growth in the later 1990s, while japan experienced lost decades

Now the us is facing another industrialized superpower nation (with a larger gdp ppp) that in contrary to japan refused to sign economic surrender plaza accord 2.0

How will the us bounce back from decline if it can't "harvest" China? So far the answer is not encouraging
They can't even agree to sign $1.9t infrastructure plan build back better which is vital for their own interest, political polarization is such that now msm openly talked about incoming civil war as soon as 2024

A parasyte cannot survive if it unable to find a host to consume

This guy says that the reason USA has always bounced back from economic crisis was because it was always able to find a new country to leech off of. But USA has been trying to leech off China for the last ten years, and China simply refuses to play ball. That's why USA is in a world of hurt right now.

Were China to be a liberal democracy that caves in to USA capitalist control, then USA would probably still be in a state of happy as it can keep milking China as a low cost factory.
 
Top