Miscellaneous News

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
maxresdefault (1).jpg

Goddamn I went to sleep with the game still ongoing and had a nightmare about Magnus Carlsen raping Nepotmniachi left right center. And then it actually happened in real life.

Man this is the first time I had a nightmare about a chess game between two strangers.

This is the first time in 5 years the World Chess Championship has produced a win-loss and not a draw-draw in regular format. The previous like 30 games were consecutive draw-draws and especially boring and bland. This is how equal modern chess has become. It took 136 moves for Magnus to win his opponent and like what 8 hours?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

RIP Nepotmniachi, not sure how it feels to be drubbed after 136 moves and 8 hours.

@Bellum_Romanum probably they need to send in World No 3 Ding Liren against Carlsen. I think Ding is the only guy in the world who can beat Magnus Carlsen now.

Ding_Liren_3,_Candidates_Tournament_2018.jpg

Ding has been World No 3 for a long time and was briefly World No 2 last month.

The Chinese player is one of the few people left on this planet with a decent record against Magnus Carlsen.
 
Last edited:

Phead128

Captain
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I know US is against this since it would mean no more reason to station troops in South Korea, what's North Korea's position on this?
You don't remember what Trump said that pissed off South Koreans?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


That is the fate of South Korea (vassal) and United States (Lord) relationship.
 

daifo

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I know US is against this since it would mean no more reason to station troops in South Korea, what's North Korea's position on this?

I remember someone in Trump's administration said he rather have millions of koreans die than N Korea be a threat to the US. It is the best interest of S Korea to hedge their bets. US policy regarding Taiwan is pretty much the same.
 

B.I.B.

Captain
Are you suggesting refining the diesel differently or making some adjustments to the truck so it can run like the older trucks? OTH, changing the refinement process or substitute for "adblue"could take time. I can recall that It must have taken 6 months before we no longer had to add an additive at the point of purchase to lead free petrol.

The article suggests its going to affect other countries as well.
I was asking my brother who said that you can get Ad Blue off switch, in which you are essentially modifying the software making it think you have adequate adblue but when you are essentially out. But as it stands currently that would be illegal.
 

windsclouds2030

Senior Member
Registered Member
China Set to Create New State-Owned Rare-Earths Giant

The move, expected to be announced this month, would aim to strengthen China’s dominance of the global supply chain around the strategic metals

By Keith Zhai | WSJ Exclusive - 03 DEC 2021

China has approved the creation of one of the world’s largest rare-earths companies to aim to maintain its dominance in the global supply chain of the strategic metals as tensions deepen with the U.S., according to people familiar with the matter.

The new firm will be called China Rare Earth Group and will be based in resource-rich Jiangxi province in southern China as soon as this month, the people said. The new entity would be created by merging rare-earths assets from some state firms, including China Minmetals Corp. , Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd. and Ganzhou Rare Earth Group Co.

The combined group is designed to further strengthen Beijing’s pricing power and avoid infighting among Chinese firms, and to use that clout to undercut Western efforts to dominate critical technologies, one of the people said.

Estimates of China’s dominance of the rare-earth industry vary. Some analysts say China mines more than 70% of the world’s rare earths and is responsible for 90% of the complex process of turning them into magnets, analysts say. A White House report has estimated that China controls 55% of the world’s rare-earth mining and 85% of the refining process.

China’s state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC), which oversees the biggest state firms, didn’t respond to a request for comment. China Minmetals, Aluminum Corp. of China and Ganzhou Rare Earth Group didn’t respond to requests for comment.

It is unclear whether the new company will have a nationwide scope or how China’s sizable rare-earth operations in Inner Mongolia are affected by the plan.

In September, the listed subsidiary of China Minmetals said in a filing to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange that its parent was planning a strategic reorganization with Aluminum Corp. of China and the government of the city of Ganzhou, in Jiangxi province, an important center for rare-earth production. The filing didn’t provide details and said the restructuring would be subject to government approval.

Rare earths are a group of 17 elements valued for their magnetic and conductive properties. They are used to manufacture a range of crucial technologies such as components in electric cars, smartphone touch screens and missile-defense systems. China’s dominance gives Beijing potential sway over makers of various fast-growing technologies.

The effort to consolidate the country’s position in rare earths comes at a time of increased sensitivity in the West that China could use its dominance in the industry as a geopolitical weapon.

Washington has raised concerns that Beijing could use its control of rare earths for strategic ends. In February, the U.S. Defense Department signed a technology investment agreement with Australia’s Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. , which the Pentagon called “the largest rare earth element mining and processing company outside of China.” Under the terms of the deal, Lynas will establish a light rare-earth processing facility in Texas.

At around the same time, President Biden issued an executive order naming rare-earth minerals as one of four key areas in need of more robust policy options to reduce supply-chain risks.

A White House review published in June said the U.S. should expect China to restrict exports of rare earths. It recommended numerous steps to expand domestic production and processing capacity in order “to increase the resilience of strategic and critical material supply chains.”

A senior official at Beijing’s top body overseeing government-backed companies said in an October press conference that the Communist Party would promote the restructuring of rare-earth assets, citing the need to optimize resource allocation and build “a world-class enterprise with global competitiveness.”

For more than a decade, Beijing has taken steps to consolidate mining, production, trading and export of rare-earth materials under a smaller number of state-run enterprises. It has also set production and export quotas and in 2014 consolidated the country’s rare-earths companies into six entities—efforts aimed at boosting prices and enhancing China’s strategic power in an industry that officials once complained was populated with small, scattered and disorderly enterprises.

The 2014 consolidation followed a World Trade Organization ruling in favor of the U.S., which claimed China had breached global trade policy rules by imposing export restraints on various forms of rare earths as well as tungsten and molybdenum, which Washington said had driven up prices of the metals.

Beijing has also cited environmental protection goals in the reorganization moves, since mining can destroy landscapes and unlock radioactivity.

The reorganization efforts have often coincided with weakness in rare-earth prices, based on the idea that fewer companies would limit domestic competition and boost values for the metals.

Rare-earth prices have yet to return to the levels they reached in mid-2011, amid heavy speculation in China and elsewhere set off by a sudden realization of the critical importance played by the relatively small and obscure industry. Since then, rare-earth mining has expanded elsewhere, companies have introduced technology to minimize use of the metals and governments have put money and rhetorical muscle behind efforts to compete with China’s industry.

A 2019 visit by Chinese leader Xi Jinping to major rare-earth operations in Jiangxi province was considered a seminal moment for the industry, and seen by Western governments as proof that Mr. Xi regarded the metals as strategic materials and could restrict their exports. The visit coincided with pressure on China by the Trump administration over Beijing’s trade practices more broadly.

China has no intention to use rare earths as a countermeasure against any country, the state-run Global Times wrote earlier this year, though it added that it remains an option when “foreign companies hurt China’s interests.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
The article is behind a paywall, so can you explain why you think it is checkmate thanks.
By aggregating all the largest rare earth companies in China into a single mega SOE that absolutely dominates the global market it gives central government a huge amount of precise control over how to weaponise rare earth.

But if China uses rare earth as a weapon wouldn't it encourage other countries to invest into this industry
Yes, it will, just like how by using chips as a weapon the US forced China into spending massively into domestic chip production. Thus it will become a race - will China crack chip production first or will US crack rare earth production first. Keep in mind as we know China's All Of Society approach to problem solving is specifically suited for focusing vast resources into solving specific problems.

China is also the dominant producer of urea - something that is not nearly as difficult to produce as rare earth and you can see how much wacky effect it's already having when China puts the squeeze on urea export. Rare earth would be a much more potent weapon.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I think this is another move towards reunification. That is pretty much the only scenario that would make the RE card worth playing for China.

I think China will gradually reduce supply (but continue to take orders as normal, just be extra slow in delivering) ever so slightly over months while co-ordinating with Chinese tech companies to deplete open market supplies as much as possible without causing a crisis.

Then when China is ready to move on Taiwan, it heaps more pressure on the US because if they dare to fight China over Taiwan, their entire high tech supply chain, including for weapons, grinds to a complete halt almost overnight.
 
Top