It is a double edge sword though, the US gov also knows that "Time is on China side" this is precisely why America is motivated to frontload the confrontation and strike while they have the advantage, be it full semiconductor ban before China catches up in EUV, or TW independence before 2027 to force China hand, or a surprise full scale nuclear decap strike of China before East Wind Mills and China orbiter shuttles get built, and other covert cough cough stuff they have already tried...
The bill has passed the Senate already. It is now on the Wisconsin Assembly for approval before becoming a law
Yeah, 30b is no small change. I first saw this video on weibo last month. It wasn't censored and was widely discussed domestically considering it contains some inconvenient truth. I see it as a good sign that at least some in Chinese government start to recognize the high cost of maintaining the current status quo regarding Taiwan.
I read somewhere, forget where exactly (already very late hours at some other day), perhaps all these shipping bottleneck is being done intentionally in order to create some artificial scarcity or problem as a pressure to the society... just like the lockdowns, mandatory vax, vax passport... just to support the Davos crowd Great Reset agenda. Perhaps at the American economist blog, Martin Armstrong: -- Just can't dismiss the thought of deliberate action for achieving something else all these months-long port drama in addition to the usual thought of ignorance + incompetence. OTOH It's also a good excuse to shift the inflation blame from Fed's money creation to goods scarcity, at least partially.
Its the same reason Tesla valuation passed a Trillion, bitcoin skyrocket like a Bezos spacecraft, and US stocks are going to the stratosphere.... its to keep the money of the masses locked up in everything from 401k to crypto so everyone is "saving", otherwise if people were spending it that would compound and expose the real issue....
China is in the security Council. Can't they just veto of it reaches that point?
