Miscellaneous News

The Observer

Junior Member
Registered Member
Another edition of accusation. That's it, I'm calling quits on any CNN China "News".

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and the rebuttal.


p.s. I saw the rebuttal first, and then curiously looked up the "news" and proofs. checks out. :rolleyes:
p.p.s The reversed building shot was on 01:07, while the "patch" shot was on 04:44
 

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
Another edition of accusation. That's it, I'm calling quits on any CNN China "News".

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

and the rebuttal.


p.s. I saw the rebuttal first, and then curiously looked up the "news" and proofs. checks out. :rolleyes:
p.p.s The reversed building shot was on 01:07, while the "patch" shot was on 04:44
Problem is that the vast majority of the anglosphere/west are stupid enough to believe this cheap propaganda.
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member
Problem is that the vast majority of the anglosphere/west are stupid enough to believe this cheap propaganda.
Sadly enough one day they will stupidly believe something that will ultimately get them into really hot water and they will still believe it out of sheer hatred for China. It is also bound to happen to Japan and Taiwan given how stupid they seem to behave lately
 

windsclouds2030

Senior Member
Registered Member
PANDEMIC BIG PICTURE

While shutting down any competition from repurposed drugs like HCQ (Hydroxychloroquine) or Ivermectin, they deftly rolled out the vaccines first, making sure not to confuse the consumer with antiviral pills that would only be allowed AFTER the majority of the population had been vaccinated.

However, lying was required, and the payoff came on Wednesday, June 9, 2021, when Merck got a fat reward. They announced the US government had agreed to pay $1.2 billion for 1.7 million doses of their new antiviral, Molnupiravir, BEFORE clinical testing showed either effectiveness or safety.

So in the end, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the former FDA Commissioner, did not endanger Pfizer's bottom line. Just as Moderna was choreographed to go first in the vaccine rollout, Merck was first with the antiviral, and Pfizer first with the booster. They would take turns as there was more than enough profit to go around. Soon it would be Pfizer’s turn at the antiviral trough, but they had to be patient for now. There was an order and method to this.

These corrupt organizers seem to be driven by a desire for MONEY, POWER, and CONTROL. Most citizens are either willing participants or are those who feel powerless to object. Most physicians who are part of organized medicine DARE NOT speak out for fear of consequences. The NIH (National Institutes of Health) influences most of the world’s medical research through the strategic use of its nearly $50 billion annual budget. As a result, it can affect most medical societies, medical journals, most research, and thus it can and does control the way data is analyzed.

From the AMA (American Medical Association) to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) to the New England Journal to the Lancet, the NIH (National Institutes of Health) controls organized medicine around the globe. But it cannot do so alone, especially abroad, which is why the WHO (World Health Organization) also figures prominently. The WHO budget is about 10% of the NIH at $5.8 billion. The GATES FOUNDATION contributes roughly 10 PER CENT of the WHO budget. Thus both Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) –- an arm of the NIH, and Bill Gates, vaccine proponent of the world, play significant roles.

Authored by Justus R. Hope, MD
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Agnus

Junior Member
Registered Member
Has France or French politicians have made prior visits in the past? Or is this visit was the first of it's kind. Also, is France trying to f..k with the U.S. attempts to reduce the tension (based on the most recent pronouncements that came from both Sino-America statements) or are we witnessing the execution of the American led strategy formulated earlier this year in England during the G-7 summit.


The visit is part of normal and regular parliamentary exchanges between France and Taiwan, which were not politicized in the past, said Mathieu Duchatel, director of the Asia Program at the Institut Montaigne in Paris.
According to the article, they did happen before but they were not politicized in this manner.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Problem is that the vast majority of the anglosphere/west are stupid enough to believe this cheap propaganda.
This is why hard power trumps soft power BS very day of the week.

If you only have soft power, the west can literally make up lies to invade you (Iraqi WMD, Syrian gas attack, if China didn’t have hard power, they would have already bombed China with their made up Uighur genocide BS lies).

Now you see the western ministry of truth working overtime to smear China, but having to be reigned back every now and again because the west doesn’t have the hard power to do anything to China and don’t want to force themselves into a corner of being called soft on China for not going to war and loosing over their own made up lies about China.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
"At public forums and in private conversations, I’m often asked: What does China want? How should we deal with them? The choice of pronouns is revealing, placing me neither here nor there. I never know how to address these comically broad questions, as if I’m some kind of dragon whisperer. Those who default to such generalisations do not really want to know China as a place. They much prefer it as an idea, a geopolitical concept that can be distilled into soundbites and translated into policy. White men can rebrand as “China experts” overnight and charge a fortune for their insights, while a Chinese person is more likely to be heard as a “dissident” than a scholar. A lone crusader against an oppressive superpower makes for an appealing narrative. It substantiates the west’s notion of China as the embodiment of authoritarian evil. It affirms to a western audience their sense of superiority. Insufficient denunciation of the Chinese regime casts doubt on one’s scholarship on China, regardless of its area of focus."


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top