Miscellaneous News

Sardaukar20

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
iewgnem said:
There's a huge difference between Chinese contractors can never be at fault, which I did not assert, and your assertion that Chinese contractor is at fault in this case without any knowledge of specifics nor having done any tracing. You made the claim that Chinese contractor is at fault in this case, you need to provide evidence.
Click to expand...
Read the articles I have shared. Preliminary findings by the Thai investigation find substandard steel is being used. Four staffs from that Chinese company have attempted to remove documents in the site office and were arrested. That's not hard evidence, but that is damn sure suspicious. That also doesn't mean that the other non-Chinese parties are not at fault.

Come on. I'm waiting for you to tell us why you believe with 100% conviction, without evidence that the Chinese company is not at fault! I hate arguing with fools. So don't be lazy with your reasoning.
 
I

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
Read the articles I have shared. Preliminary findings by the Thai investigation find substandard steel is being used. Four staffs from that Chinese company have attempted to remove documents in the site office and were arrested. That's not hard evidence, but that is damn sure suspicious. That also doesn't mean that the other non-Chinese parties are not at fault.

Come on. I'm waiting for you to tell us why you believe with 100% conviction, without evidence that the Chinese company is not at fault! I hate arguing with fools. So don't be lazy with your reasoning.
Click to expand...
Because until there is evidence Chinese contractor is at fault, they're not, it's not complicated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top