Miscellaneous News

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
You see, people can hate and criticize Vietnam all they want, but they smelled the coffee just before sht went down. Late enough to leave US, to extract all benefits from US; early enough to join China to get some first-mover benefits.

And people say Vietnamese are totally not related to Chinese lmao
One of the reason the a lot US companies moved to Vietnam is to maintain their Chinese suppliers closer, this is going to totally kill a lot US companies if consumers and manufacturers don't pay for the tariffs.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
How do you know it's not an architectural design issue? Chill bud. Just wait for the investigation report.
I'm eager to see the investigation report. But it's gonna take months if not years for it finish. However you need to know more about how construction projects work. And avoid shaping the narrative that the Chinese side can never screw up. My take on this is that many sides are at fault, including the Chinese contractor. But when it comes to blame games, it is easiest to dump all the blame on that Chinese contractor.

Architects design. C&S engineers and contractors build. If there is a problem with the architectural design, it is sorted out at the design stage by consultant civil engineers before being signed off by them. Architects are the easiest side to be let off the hook. Because in modern construction, the burden of structural engineering have largely been moved to the consultants.

We don't know who the consultants are, and they very well could be non-Chinese. Usually the consultants will up-spec, to give themselves plenty of margin for safety, to protect their asses, and to keep their reputation. Usually it's the final building owner who would try to press prices down and pressure the contractor to cut corners. Use lower spec materials, build less safety items, compromised design, etc. If responsible, they would all check with the consultants to recalculate, and draw the line on how low they can go. Still, the building owner could also overrule the consultant. Or just as equally common, the contractor could cheat the spec. Maybe to earn extra margins, or give someone some kickbacks. This building is owned by the Thai government, so there could very well be corruption involved. So let's look out for the investigation results.
 
Last edited:

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
You know nothing about how construction project works or how supply chain works. You can't even come up with any arguments. It shows how shallow you actually are. Don't be a blind fanboy.
The problem is your pretending that you do.
And I do know how supply chain works, I am part of the supply chain, but I still wouldn't go around pretending I know specifics of any project I'm not involved in.
 

GulfLander

Captain
Registered Member

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Imagine putting billions to move to Vietnam or Cambodia just to be met with this crap. AND you can't move to any other country because the uncertainty of that could be tariffs in the future.

Companies will have to pay the tariffs or move to the US, BUT remember that raw materials ARE ALSO tariffed and manufacturing costs in the US will significantly increase.

The biggest irony of all of this is that probably is going to make more US companies to move to China, I explain myself, looks like that US companies will have to make TWO products, one made in the US much expensive for US consumers and another made for the rest of the world much cheaper or a least competitive with other international companies. The incentive to not manufacturing in China to have only one supply chain is gone. If you are going to have two supply chains anyway, why not have at least one competitive.

View attachment 149253
An accompanying video that generally explains the principle of your post.


 

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
Then argue with me! You're so smart right? Expose me that I'm pretending! Show me what you know about construction and engineering! Bring it on!

Why only write one liners and personal attacks?
You're the one who asserted you're part of this specific construction project, it seems to me you should be the one to prove that assertion is true. Until then, you're not part of this project and as such you have no ability to know what occurred on this project.

It's not that complicated.
 
Top