Miscellaneous News

proelite

Junior Member
I think it is highly dependent on who achieved the breakthrough first. Because while the initial breakthrough is of course critically important, so is the ability to roll things out at pace and scale.

Super advanced designs doesn’t mean much when they are stuck on the drawing board.

So, if China achieves AGI first, it’s basically GG for America. But if America gets there first, even with a 2 year head start, it would be unwise to count China out.

America will use AGI to do what they are already doing, making massive profits from software, services, and ecosystems by replacing human labor and seeking rent. In summary, America will use AGI to do wealth transfer from the have nots to the haves.

As long as the fundamental contract between government, people, and corporations remains unchanged in the West, they don't stand to benefit from AGI.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Rubio Says Trump Greenland Bid ‘Not a Joke,’ Citing China Risk​

The top US diplomat said President Donald Trump’s proposal to buy Greenland “is not a joke” because of the risk that China would station resources on the island that threaten American security and the importance of Arctic shipping lanes for energy exports.

“Those conversations are going to happen, but this is not a joke,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said about discussions between Trump and Danish authorities over potentially buying the island. He spoke in an interview on SiriusXM’s The Megyn Kelly Show posted online Thursday. Rubio also reiterated the Trump administration’s interest in the Panama Canal.

Rubio, who has previously defended Trump’s interest in Greenland, said Beijing may deploy Chinese companies to establish operations on the island that might one day be used by its military, adding that this was also a concern in Panama.

“It is completely realistic to believe that the Chinese will eventually, maybe even in the short term, try to do in Greenland what they have done at the Panama Canal and in other places,” said Rubio, a longtime China hawk. “And that is install facilities that give them access to the Arctic with the cover of a Chinese company, but that in reality serve a dual purpose — that in a moment of conflict they could send naval vessels to that facility and operate from there.”

Rubio said Arctic shipping routes were going to be crucial for the Trump administration’s plan to export more American energy. Greenland’s potential as a source of critical minerals also has been cited within Trump’s camp as a reason for its strategic value.

A spokesman for China’s embassy in Washington, Liu Pengyu, told Bloomberg in a statement that Rubio’s accusations about a possible dual-use facility on Greenland “are totally groundless and unfounded.” He added that Beijing “does not take part in managing or operating” the Panama Canal and respects the country’s sovereignty.

This week, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen sought to drum up support from European allies to stand up to Trump’s efforts to appropriate Greenland.

While Rubio was seen as the most conventional of Trump’s cabinet picks, he’s fully backed Trump’s foreign policy ideas, including a disruptive foreign aid freeze that has alarmed global aid organizations including the World Health Organization.

Trump has also called for the US to retake control of the Panama Canal unless the cost of passage for naval and merchant ships is slashed. He has falsely accused China of operating the waterway, exaggerating the significance of two ports on either side of the canal operated by a Hong Kong-based firm.

On Wednesday evening, Trump’s Pentagon chief, Pete Hegseth, said the US had the right to “do what is necessary” to ensure access to the Panama Canal.
The top US diplomat said President Donald Trump’s proposal to buy Greenland “is not a joke” because of the risk that China would station resources on the island that threaten American security and the importance of Arctic shipping lanes for energy exports.
Rubio, who has previously defended Trump’s interest in Greenland, said Beijing may deploy Chinese companies to establish operations on the island that might one day be used by its military

Pro-Consul Rubio: To stop the Chinese from investing in Greenland. We must annex Greenland first

and the importance of Arctic shipping lanes for energy exports.

If the earth isn’t warming. Why are you guys so concerned about the frozen arctic trade route? The thick ice isn’t suppose to be melting.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

EU and Nato take vow of silence on Greenland​

The EU and Nato have taken a vow of silence over Greenland after Denmark requested its allies refrain from reacting to Donald Trump’s threats to seize the Arctic island.

Copenhagen’s strategy of avoiding public confrontation with Trump, which four officials said was closely co-ordinated with Nato and the EU, underscores the scramble among US allies to work out how to handle the US president’s pugnacious diplomacy.

Trump had a fiery 45-minute phone call with Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen last week, putting Copenhagen into what officials described as “crisis mode”. Trump has threatened to target tariffs against Denmark and has refused to rule out taking the Arctic island by force.

Trump reiterated this weekend that he “will get” Greenland — an autonomous part of the kingdom of Denmark — while mocking Copenhagen’s “dog sleighs” defending the island, where the US has the biggest military presence.

The US, through Nato, is a military ally of Denmark with a mutual defence agreement. The EU’s governing treaty also contains a mutual defence clause.

Danish and European officials had initially hoped Trump’s comments about taking Greenland were a tactic to gain more influence over the territory, which has increased in importance as Russia and China seek more influence in the Arctic.

Officials in recent days realised the situation “should be taken far more seriously”, said one, given the global implications of Nato or the EU failing to condemn a violation of national sovereignty by one of their allies.

But Danish, EU and Nato officials have so far decided to minimise public discussion because of Copenhagen’s deep sensitivities and its conclusion that openly challenging Trump will only exacerbate the crisis.

“A low profile seems to be the safest bet with Trump. Hopefully he will be distracted by something else,” said one senior European official.

Another senior EU official said: “We believe a tit for tat approach is not useful. [But] we all stand by our basic principles, such as national sovereignty and territorial integrity, that must be respected. We are ready, and the Danes know that, to reaffirm that whenever needed.”

Frederiksen will on Tuesday visit German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Berlin, French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris and Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte in Brussels in a whistle-stop diplomatic tour.

Frederiksen met her Norwegian and Swedish counterparts and Finland’s president in Copenhagen on Sunday night, where the issue of Greenland was raised in discussions.

No joint declaration was issued following the meeting. There have also been no efforts to co-ordinate Nato or EU statements in defence of Denmark or Greenland.

When asked about Trump’s Greenland comments, Rutte told the European parliament last week: “Trump has been right many times . . . we need to dialogue with him.”

“This is not about who rules or controls Greenland,” Rutte continued. “This is, of course, about making sure that the Arctic stays safe.” Neither the head of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, nor European Council president António Costa have made public statements regarding Trump’s threats against Denmark.

“We are not negotiating Greenland. We are supporting our member state Denmark,” EU chief diplomat Kaja Kallas said on Monday after a meeting of the bloc’s foreign ministers. “We are looking at it from the side of Europe, not reacting to what the US is doing.”

Behind the scenes senior officials in Brussels, Copenhagen and Nuuk are discussing how the bloc could strengthen its partnership with Greenland on critical raw materials extraction and energy, according to two European officials briefed on the discussions.

“There’s a lot of discreet work going on right now to see how we can strengthen co-operation with Greenland,” said one of the officials. They added the EU wanted to avoid appearing like the EU was making an offer, after years of inaction, “because Trump has put it on the agenda”.

Frederiksen’s government is “doing the right thing in communicating to the Americans in a firm but polite way,” said Rasmus Jarlov, a former Danish minister and current MP from the opposition Conservative party.

“It’s a good idea not to engage in verbal exchanges with the Trump administration. It’s a good idea to talk to allies in [the] rest of Europe; Europe should stand together if the situation should escalate,” he added.

Some officials have raised concerns over whether Europe could offer any credible response to Trump acting on his threats regarding Greenland.

“I’m not saying there’s no plan,” said the second European official. “But we don’t really have an alternative approach.”
“A low profile seems to be the safest bet with Trump. Hopefully he will be distracted by something else,” said one senior European official.

The Europeans have a new strategy to prevent the annexation of Greenland.

Hope that Trump will eventually forgot about it

.

9imxnn.jpg
 

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada may not include oil​

  • U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters on Thursday that he would go ahead with long-threatened import tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico.
  • The president said he was yet to make a decision on whether oil imports would be included in the policy, saying it depended on whether the two nations “treat us properly.”
  • Both Canada and Mexico have previously pledged to respond to tariffs with measures of their own

Donald Trump has confirmed he will impose 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada from February, following through on threats issued weeks earlier.

The blanket tariffs on the countries’ products will come into effect on Saturday, Feb. 1.

However, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday evening, Trump told reporters his administration was yet to determine whether oil imports would be included in the policy, noting that the decision was pinned on whether the two nations “treat us properly” and “if the oil is properly priced.”

“Oil is going to have nothing to do with it as far as I’m concerned,” he said. “We’re going to make that determination probably tonight on oil. Because they send us oil, we’ll see – it depends on what their price is.”

March contracts for Brent crude
— the global benchmark for oil prices — were marginally higher at 8:06 a.m. London time, trading around $76.92 a barrel.

Trump told reporters the looming duties were being leveraged “for a number of reasons” and “may or may not rise with time.”

“No. 1 is the people that have poured into our country so horribly and so much,” he said. “No. 2 is the drugs fentanyl and everything else that have come into the country, and No. 3 are the massive subsidies that we’re giving to Canada and Mexico in the form of deficits.”

“I’ll be putting the tariff of 25% on Canada and separately 25% on Mexico, and we’ll really have to do that because we have very big deficits with those countries,” he added.

Threats to respond in kind

Representatives for the Mexican and Canadian governments were not immediately available for comment when contacted by CNBC, although both nations have previously pledged to respond to tariffs with measures of their own.

“If there are U.S. tariffs, Mexico would also raise tariffs,” President Claudia Sheinbaum said at a news conference last week, according to news agency Reuters, adding that this would trigger price rises for American consumers.

Mexico and Canada are the United States’ biggest trade partners. In 2020, during his first tenure in office, Trump replaced the three countries’ long-standing North America Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, with his United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which was touted at the time as a better deal for American businesses.

On Friday, Sheinbaum told reporters Mexico would “wait with a cool head” before making any decisions about how to respond to Trump’s tariffs regime.

“We will always defend the dignity of our people, respect for our sovereignty and a dialogue as equals without subordination,” she said, according to Reuters. “We are prepared, and we maintain this dialogue.”

Canada trade minister: Tariffs on Canada will make things more expensive for Americans
Speaking on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” earlier this month, Canada’s minister of international trade, Mary Ng, said “everything is on the table” when it comes to responding to U.S. tariffs, refusing to rule out export taxes on energy exports to the United States.

“If you’re going to put tariffs on Canada, what it actually will do is make things more expensive for Americans,” she said.

There are also concerns that tariffs will hit consumers in Canada and Mexico, however. Earlier this week, for example, policymakers at the Bank of Canada warned that such measures by the U.S. could create persistent inflation in the country.

Both the Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar edged higher against the U.S. dollar on Friday morning, recovering losses seen overnight.

The peso was up 0.3% at 8:18 a.m. London time, while the Canadian dollar gained 0.2% against the greenback.

$21 billion a month

Carl Weinberg, founder of High Frequency Economics, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Friday that the “numbers are big” when it comes to potential economic collateral damage.

“We’ve got about a trillion dollars’ worth of trade in round numbers worth of [U.S.] imports from Mexico and Canada combined,” he said. “Twenty-five percent of $1 trillion is $250 billion, and that is roughly what is going to come out of the U.S. economy to pay these tariffs.”

He said this equates to around $21 billion a month.

“It will be a plus for bringing down the deficit, that’s the good news here — but it’s going to come out of people’s pockets,” he told CNBC, warning that U.S. growth would also likely be impacted.

“It’s going to impact in February and March this quarter, and then in all the months of the next quarter,” Weinberg said. “We’re going to get a hit of about six-tenths of a percent off of GDP growth in the first quarter, and then another tenth of a percent in the second quarter.”

“We don’t need Canadian Oil & Gas” from last week.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

India to develop DeepSeek rival this year – IT minister​

New Delhi plans to launch an AI model by the end of 2025 to compete with DeepSeek and ChatGPT, Ashwini Vaishnaw has announced

India will develop its own large language model powered by artificial intelligence (AI) to compete with DeepSeek and ChatGPT, Minister of Electronics and IT Ashwini Vaishnaw told media on Thursday. It is expected to be “ready within the next 10 months,” he stated, adding that its foundational framework is already in place.

With the groundwork complete, the government is now focusing on creating a system tailored to India’s unique requirements, the minister noted.

As part of its artificial intelligence push, the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has approved 18 proposals aimed at accelerating AI solutions in key sectors such as agriculture and climate change. According to a Mint report, this support includes access to computing power, data, and funding.

Vaishnaw also revealed that six major developers are set to launch foundational AI models by the end of the year. To make related development more “affordable and accessible,” the minister said the government will subsidize 40% of computing costs, lowering the average price per AI computing unit from $1.29 per hour.

This initiative is a key component of the $1.2 billion IndiaAI mission, which seeks to develop both large and small language models. To strengthen domestic AI capabilities, New Delhi is working on building a computing infrastructure of over 18,000 graphics processing units (GPUs). Billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s Jio Platforms is among the companies racing to achieve this, utilizing advanced processors like Nvidia’s H100 chips.

Earlier this month, Bloomberg repotted that Ambani is planning to build what could become the world’s largest data center in Jamnagar, in the state of Gujarat. Ambani-led conglomerate Reliance Industries operates a massive refinery, considered world’s largest, in Jamnagar.

The data center is expected have a total capacity of three gigawatts, which would put India on the map in terms of advanced technological capabilities. Today’s largest operational data centers are mostly located in the US and are under one gigawatt.

Vaishnaw’s statements came shortly after the AI model DeepSeek gained global attention. It recently surpassed US-based OpenAI’s ChatGPT as the most popular AI assistant on Apple’s App Store.

Analysts view the Chinese model’s breakthrough as evidence that AI innovation does not necessarily require massive capital investments, signalling a shift in how this kind of technological progress can be achieved globally.
It is expected to be “ready within the next 10 months,” he stated,
 

4Runner

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

LOL. I am not mocking TSLA here as I always admire Musk for his gusty ventures. But on his belief in a canned vision only solution in FSD, I have my doubts. Maybe one day down the road, it would become technically feasible to have L3/L4 compliant canned vision only FSD in consumer cars. I cannot wait the month of April and May as a few big cities in China start allowing L3 on public roads.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Yeah a"fangirl" with an icepick,hand to hand skills,vial of poison and a smuggled 9mil handgun.Just read though that Liang visited his home village and WAS accompanied by security guards-so no stupid naivete there-good.

Liang needs to boost his drip and pull a Castro on such CIA assets.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top