Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
"Nectar Gan" is a perfect name for a pornstar-did Deepseek choose it?WTF is it about pandas?
Oh no. Are they gonna arrest Ms. Ching Chong for being a national security threat?
Forget bribes, I want vengeance, I want the hands and heads of all those who so much as laid a finger on any Chinese person, especially those who abused Chinese elders during the first trump presidency, and then to make the lesson clear, I want the 9 familial executions on all of those who committed crimes against Chinese. Let it be known that if ChatGPT thinks the entire world should be sacrificed for one Jew, then six million Jews equate to one Chinese life.
So you reckon the quants bros are doing what they do best and shorting Nasdaq?
Woke: use algorithmic trading and make a lot of money on Shanghai Stock Exchange
Bespoke: use your GPUs instead to come up with a revolutionary AI model, give it away under open source and crash US stock market while you short US tech shares
Woke: use algorithmic trading and make a lot of money on Shanghai Stock Exchange
Bespoke: use your GPUs instead to come up with a revolutionary AI model, give it away under open source and crash US stock market while you short US tech shares
No, that's way too complicated as an explanation for laymen like us.
The most straightforward answer should be that the US just lost 153 Ford-class CVNs in one day.
You can also say that's about 200-400 billion hamburgers wasted (given that a hamburger costs like 5-10 dollars on average in NYC) in one day.
Last edited:
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
"DeepSeek is a wake up call for America, but it doesn’t change the strategy: - USA must out-innovate &race faster, as we have done in the entire history of AI - Tighten export controls on chips so that we can maintain future leads Every major breakthrough in AI has been American"
This is the stupidest response I've heard to DeepSeek. Innovating faster as a strategy only makes any sense when you're already innovating faster. When you're not, any actual strategy has to address how to innovate faster. You've got 1/4th the population, lower per capita STEM graduates, lazier workers, and now you're pushing your most important demographic in science, the Chinese in America, back to China. So how are you gonna innovate faster? How's a midget who just dropped an anvil on his right foot gonna run faster than Usain Bolt? Just because this midget used to dominate the race? Yeah, but that was when he was racing exclusively against other midgets; now it turns out one of them wasn't a midget but a child. He's 6'3" now and can jog 100m in less then 10 seconds; you're strategy is to still just derp waddle faster than him??
Another perspective.
...
Is that palatir?
Is that palatir?
Last edited: