Miscellaneous News

A

azn_cyniq

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think there's a good chance that many of the Americans that are currently on Xiaohongshu end up staying on the app. I use Xiaohongshu and I used to use Instagram and frankly, Xiaohongshu is far better. Their recommendation algorithms actually show me content that I'm interested in. I'm shocked that Meta, a $1.5 trillion company, still can't field decent recommendation algorithms.

I sincerely hope that India bans Xiaohongshu though. It's a great app and it shouldn't be ruined by their presence.
 
C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
GulfLander said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1878349981595152494

...

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879013216216580158
Click to expand...
These Indians are truly pathetic creatures; this is what happens when turds and toxicity raise to the top of supposedly human society.
azn_cyniq said:
I think there's a good chance that many of the Americans that are currently on Xiaohongshu end up staying on the app. I use Xiaohongshu and I used to use Instagram and frankly, Xiaohongshu is far better. Their recommendation algorithms actually show me content that I'm interested in. I'm shocked that Meta, a $1.5 trillion company, still can't field decent recommendation algorithms.

I sincerely hope that India bans Xiaohongshu though. It's a great app and it shouldn't be ruined by their presence.
Click to expand...
This could be the reason why:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1878841704767447544

parasites can never create, they can only destroy.
 
FriedButter

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
daifo said:
Maybe a joint venture in the us tik tok operation?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

The whole story is odd and unusual even before considering when TikTok made a public statement saying that it was fiction.

Chinese officials are evaluating a potential option that involves Elon Musk acquiring the US operations of TikTok if the company fails to fend off a controversial ban on the short-video app, according to people familiar with the matter.
Click to expand...
One person close to the company, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the strategy, said before the Supreme Court hearing that the legal battle is still the focus of top executives and they would prefer to keep fighting in the US rather than sell TikTok US and cede control for good.
Click to expand...

Bytedance/TikTok was the one who tried to sell it several years ago and the government stopped them. Now the government is open to selling but Bytedance/TikTok is fiercely opposed to it which begs the question. Why would they be opposed to selling it. It was their idea in the first place.
 
FairAndUnbiased

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
siegecrossbow said:
We should commemorate this momentous occasion every January 13th from this day forth. Maybe we name it International Bingchilling Day to go along with the brainrot theme?

Which one do you think is more satisfactory? The Bingchilling Day rebellion or the CHAD reveal, and why?
Click to expand...
Having an advantage over an opponent is good.

Having the opponent realize that resistance was wrong in the first place, though?
 
daifo

daifo

Major
Registered Member
FriedButter said:
The whole story is odd and unusual even before considering when TikTok made a public statement saying that it was fiction.




Bytedance/TikTok was the one who tried to sell it several years ago and the government stopped them. Now the government is open to selling but Bytedance/TikTok is fiercely opposed to it which begs the question. Why would they be opposed to selling it. It was their idea in the first place.
Click to expand...

I think another press release from tik tok claim it is fake news
 
T

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
coolgod said:
Bytedance is a Chinese company, their CEO and probably founder have Singaporean citizenship.
Click to expand...
I think if we stick to the letters of the law, China would not block sell of TikTok by Bytedance to anyone. The only thing China would do is to make sure Bytedance' IP and secret is not ending up in American hands. If the sell is just the label "Tiktok" nothing else, China would not bother to talk to anyone, nor does US need to ask for China's approval. The only reason China bother to get involved is if the sell involves real value (the IP). This is what Bloomberg is trying to suggest in its article, however this means China makes exception (break her own law that was freshly made for TikTok). This makes "China surrounder". This is the whole thing about Bloomberg's article and this isn't alone, US media has been making such suggestions ever since the begining.
 
coolgod

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
1736884782998.jpeg

Tiktok Refugees are quick learners.


taxiya said:
I think if we stick to the letters of the law, China would not block sell of TikTok by Bytedance to anyone. The only thing China would do is to make sure Bytedance' IP and secret is not ending up in American hands. If the sell is just the label "Tiktok" nothing else, China would not bother to talk to anyone, nor does US need to ask for China's approval. The only reason China bother to get involved is if the sell involves real value (the IP). This is what Bloomberg is trying to suggest in its article, however this means China makes exception (break her own law that was freshly made for TikTok). This makes "China surrounder". This is the whole thing about Bloomberg's article and this isn't alone, US media has been making such suggestions ever since the begining.
Click to expand...

I don't understand your message at all, we all know that Bloomberg article was fake news, even before Tiktok denied it.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top