NATO is not just the EU. NATO is nothing less than the US military empire, literally occupying countries.
Who does? Only you? We all don't know?
What subject was it and what did I change it to?
Your prediction that Ukraine be partitioned is not wiley or difficult to predict. It's basically a question of whether Russia takes all of Ukraine. Yes or no? If not, then that is the likely scenerio and we're not saying that it's unlikely. However,
We do argue that such a thing in which Russia annexes a large percentage of Ukraine into itself cannot be considered any kind of stalemate.
1. It's excellent for Russia in every way. More territory, smaller hostile Ukraine, China-oriented economy, renewed and refined military.
I will.
I've no complaints. Russia has done well against a NATO-supported Ukraine, is doing better every day, but has room for improvement like everyone.
Never heard of this.
While you are coping with the loss of 18% of Ukraine into Russia as a neutral stalemate.
OK
America is China's fight; Russia cannot pose a comprehensive challenge to the US but Russia can take out its European ally to make China's job easier.
A much poorer EU than before. And it has entwined Russia's and China's economies. It's good to sort things out where they belong.
Yes, the goal is to first take out the weaker areas of NATO like EU.
why follow Putin statements. Putin also said he attacked Ukraine because he was bored. you still not getting that he has deep contempt for alot of people including Russians. if Ukraine was governed by pro Russia before 2014 than what was Russia actual investments in that country?. that was time when Kadyrov said his wealth is given directly by Allah. meaning it is not humanly possible to earn it on earth. that FIFA/Olympics small potato. i already gave you link that 80% of private business registered in occupied Ukraine is from southern Russia. here is another link deputy chairman of Russian government (a Federal official) is looking after city of Mariupol and you can see his credentials.
That annexation would be just a consolation prize in the face of defeat or stalemate.
This is obvious, but as the West is richer and has the historical advantage, it is worse for Russia.
Or it could be the other way around and NATO could first exhaust Russia and then focus on encircling China.
Have you seen NATO leaders? Look at the likes of Scholz, Yoon or Trump, even the "aggressive" Netanyahu that cannot even properly capture a few 1000 km2 of territory.
Most Western "leaders" are just puppets who can be fired if they don't please enough. But the ones who really have control are the military and the big industrial corporations. And these guys are not as naive or unprepared as you think.
