Miscellaneous News

sheogorath

Major
Registered Member
There's more. Killing a few American soldiers to induce the US to bomb North Korea. I would ask Rep. Kim Byung-joo or Rep. Park Sun-won to find out who is in charge of that unit."
"Yoon's Plan B in case the Plan A failed was to run a false flag operation to fake a North Korean attack on several targets including US troops."

Bad dog!

Kim Jong-un must have known something, no wonder he went "fuck this shit" and blew up the roads at the border.

Accdg to wiki, Peter Thiel is an American entrepreneur, venture capitalist, and political activist. A co-founder of PayPal, Palantir Technologies, and Founders Fund, he was the first outside investor in Facebook.
He is also a massive creep and a fascist. He is one of those weirdos obessessed with eternal youth and routinely does blood transfusions with young people's blood

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General


I think there is a good chance Xi will attend. Not out of any delusions about being able to strike a deal or to massage Trump’s ego, which Xi will of course do to some extent. But I think Xi will feel a sense of duty to go to try and stave off a hot war if possible. There is no substitute for looking another man in the eyes and telling him something, but to make sure the massage is delivered without filtering, and also to gauge their reaction.

Whether Trump tries to humiliate Xi is actually rather immaterial. Xi is not going to let personal emotion sway his decision on matters of national importance. He will not change his chosen course whether you flatter or insult him.

In many ways, Trump trying to humiliate Xi would be a massive bonus for Xi.

One of Xi’s biggest challenges is in managing the massage for China’s domestic audience that the coming war is thrust upon China and not of China’s choosing, and that China has done everyone possible to try and avoid it. The Americans have made that task extraordinarily easy, and Trump pulling some bullshit will be a cherry on top when Xi has literally traveled thousands of miles to honour Trump.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Muslims are an unstable bunch. If we leave, you bitch and moan about us not being doers. If we're there, you complain that they're not loyal people... abd that's somehow on us too. Classic time of the month behavior.

Honestly you're putting China on a pedistal with your expectations. Terrorists and proxys are America's game because America doesn't have the inner power but it does have the post WWII connections. Growing is China's game because we have everything we need at home. Myanmar's relations are already much closer to China than the US. We keep beating up Filipino boats, taking islands and building them while the US just watches; it's not our fault they're too stupid to get it that they're hugging the wrong leg. You expect us to totally smoke the US even at their own game before we're done overtaking them? You know it takes decades, centuries in the old times for a large power to rise above another, right?

Trying what? You give these people anything and they throw it on the ground and run. There were no options there.

You're daydreaming that China's playing that game. We're not. We're in our lab making tech that no one else can contend with, not bleeding out trying to prop up people trying to commit suicide.

"Alternative facts" LOL Haven't heard that in a bit, huh? It's coming back!

What lives? Syrian lives. Not Chinese lives.

You are more easily scared than a mouse. The US has no chance at all of isolating China; the new Syrian government's first priority was declaring the China and Russia that everything we have there is safe. I don't really trust them, but you have clearly missed the global trend of China becoming more and more integral to the world economy.

Hasn't failed so far. What's your strategy? Making friends by couping/invading people? As the non-dominant superpower? Stupid and suicidal.

Oh, I guess then we should see Chinese trade declining, right? Right? Do we see that?

Pakistan being "all over the world?" Muslim countries are not safe; we knew that going in. And even so, we have recently began to fight against the terrorists there. The only crying is you on this forum.

When we have grown more powerful than NATO and are confident that we can not only win but win a decisive, none phyrric WWIII if it were to pass.

1. When they start building a massive and modern military... did it happen yet?
2. Trade and economics is the number one option. The EU/US wishes they could still use trade to boost their global power.

The US sometimes wins at its game of regime change but we always win at our game of becoming stronger. I'd bet on a growing young lion over a king of mice and roaches anyday.

Wowwww that is stupid. All your posts are stupid but this one wins. Wait... I remember someone saying China should stop churning out warships to invest more on the Olympics.... was that you?

What did you mention? Provide weapons to people known for throwing away weapons and running. Other than that, all you mentioned... was bitching...

That doesn't complicate anything for them; it complicates things for us. It overstretches our logistics, overstretches our military and puts them out there for things that do not align with China's national goal, which is to first wrest control of Asia from the US if conflict occurs.
Thing is, arabs are not so different from Indian jai hinds in that they display the “gold chain culture” of boasting, talking big, but lacking in any real substance and action. These types of races excel in loquacious jobs like real estate and cryptocurrency but fail at jobs that expect concrete results eg STEM. The only proper response to them is to tell them to put the metaphorical fries in the bag.
Kim Jong-un must have known something, no wonder he went "fuck this shit" and blew up the roads at the border.


He is also a massive creep and a fascist. He is one of those weirdos obessessed with eternal youth and routinely does blood transfusions with young people's blood

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Thats par for the course when it comes to Atlanticist elites, otherwise pizzagate wouldn’t be a thing.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think there is a good chance Xi will attend. Not out of any delusions about being able to strike a deal or to massage Trump’s ego, which Xi will of course do to some extent. But I think Xi will feel a sense of duty to go to try and stave off a hot war if possible. There is no substitute for looking another man in the eyes and telling him something, but to make sure the massage is delivered without filtering, and also to gauge their reaction.

Whether Trump tries to humiliate Xi is actually rather immaterial. Xi is not going to let personal emotion sway his decision on matters of national importance. He will not change his chosen course whether you flatter or insult him.

In many ways, Trump trying to humiliate Xi would be a massive bonus for Xi.

One of Xi’s biggest challenges is in managing the massage for China’s domestic audience that the coming war is thrust upon China and not of China’s choosing, and that China has done everyone possible to try and avoid it. The Americans have made that task extraordinarily easy, and Trump pulling some bullshit will be a cherry on top when Xi has literally traveled thousands of miles to honour Trump.
I saw one good argument for going, from Taiwanese talk show no less: this invitation is much like Chiang Kai-shek inviting Mao to Chongqing to negotiate the for either a new united front or civil war in 1945. Even if you already know the negotiation will not be in good faith not going would be unbecoming for a leader.
 
Top