Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Reporter: Clarissa Ward
British-American television journalist who is the chief international correspondent for CNN. She won a "peobody award for her Syria reports".
She covers syria and seemingly also Wagner
Update:
It was her??
Last edited:
If you risk nothing, you lose nothing, but you also don't have the potential to win. China has been playing a very safe, low risk strategy. I wouldn't advocate military involvement or even sanctions around the world. But giving Syria very good access to the Chinese market and just investing a little more money would have been a cheap way to do a little bit to help.
Investing with zero hope for profit is what China does in Pakistan. Why not Syria? Of course it should be more for neighbouring countries, but not essentially nothing. Apparently investment in Iran according to the ft is also minimal, not even a billion
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
It's only bullshit coming out of you imagining what's happening rather than reading.
1. If Israel lets that happen. You think they don't want those resources?
2. Of all the advanced countries that are aligned with the US against China, Syria is really not one on the radar... if it even goes that way.
TikTok? It seems we really don't need to do much; smart people can see through it and self-create content. Stupid people will always like stupid answers and we can't beat the US at stupid.
Low quality people present risks to investment. You need to think about that.
1. We're surviving.
2. Our military is not all around the would; it's close to us.
3. So you're delusional, not him.
It's an overall competition; the US can't really compete at all with us economically. They still have a traditionally more powerful military though.
Not terribly impressed with their brainstorming results. Might work on some small fry but China is the Moby Dick they cannot defeat.
China's success is right at home. Whatever we build for the global south is nice, but our success does not depend on it.
Being nuclear has nothing to do with it. America's using it's post-WWII old boys club to rouse trouble. Really the only way you can beat that is to outgrow them economically, technologically, and militarily until they realize they're way behind and can't touch you.
China's infrastructure investments around the world far out-strip America's. We build things; they do not.
What game? Low IQ people don't see the game that high IQ people play. The highest level of game there is is elevating your own civilization until all conflicts are won by your superiority rather than wrestling in a pig pen.
The Assad govt gave China bases in the Med?
The fact is this guy did nothing aside from retain his own basic rule, because he's politically paralysed due to his ethnicity/faith. So naturally the Syrian people would rather have someone extreme but at least capable of giving a promise, no matter how far fetched, of reuniting the country.
Taiwan is already China's, it's US that's disputing and it and it's US that will have to invade in order to change the status quo.
Okay so since the cold war started, life in China has remained essentially unaffected by western action. If anything, when the war started, the PRC has a much weaker position, with active separatists in HK and Xinjiang. Those are now gone, while the CN economy remains booming like it was in 2014.
Meanwhile,since the start of the cold war, the western empire has received pressure to collapse multiple "democracies" (Romania, France, Hungary, SK). It has lost all growth in EU and Asia, with only US retaining a small amount of growth at the cost of consumer inflation. It has failed to convincingly surpass China's ally Russia in weapons output and sanctions have prevented them from developing an independent world class drone/robots sector.
So it is clear in plain sight which side is doing nothing, or at least not doing anything but flailing around in self defense: the west.
If you had to name all the nations that blow up western stuff while still receiving western support, do you have any idea how little that narrows it down?
US is not in Myanmar, it's all China's playground. So you're delusional and seeing US where they aren't lol
It's like thinking China is in Mexico creating cartels lmao you're ascribing mythical powers to an adversary for no reason, this reeks of either propaganda or an empty skull.
US started out with those colonies, the Qing gave them up 100s of years ago, before the PRC was established.
China will need a vast military campaign to take back those colonies. Preceding such a campaign, a country should seek to weaken the enemy maximally, such as depleting his weapon stocks, using sanctions to destroy his industries, and destabilising his rule.
You are having a huge meltdown over something that barely concerns China. Middle East has always been a powder keg. China is smart for not getting involved. Their priority is Taiwan province.
Last edited:
Is T41pe1 applying the bump tactic of PH?
Completely different Pakistan served a Purpose which is to deter India and open a second front , plus they're a loyal friend, that ironclad friendship was form decades of trial and error that had enhance that friendship. So yes Pakistan is special for the Chinese and they know that the Chinese will stay with them until the end.
Pakistan is a nuclear armed neighbour that can used to play off India. It also plays a role in the BRI. Let's say China finally takes action against Taiwan and India wants to intervene, Pakistan would come in handy to stop India. If China gets Taiwan, the investment will be well worth it.
I personally disagree with the investment in Pakistan given the lack of progress. But the CPC must see something I don't. What they need to do is slap those guys in Pakistanis to take their jobs more seriously especially with that India backed terrorist group.
Last edited: