Turkey should never be included in BRICS. Probably even worse than having radical Hindu extremist India in BRICS. Turkey is a radical Islamic extremist regime with expansionist mindset just like India. India and Turkey will be a big problem for the world in the 21st century.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
I was seeing on telegram channels about some Russia/Brics supporters complaining that China should have done something.
Firstly why didn't they ask during the 10 extra years when Assad was there? Why only now? Did they not have faith in China back then?
Secondly why should China intervene when we can see that the country's people themselves don't want to fight hard for it? In fact why should China be obligated to use force? Maybe there is some other way out? After all they keep saying China are pussies and not manly like Russia who shows its might so why should China change its methods just for them?
Now I see why Nato and those other organizations the west have only let in western Europeans and maybe vassal states like Japan. Because they don't want to risk having to bail out others and don't want troublemakers. Thats why they can pretend they always help coz they frankly never needed to help much in the first place. Afghanistan and Vietnam were bad enough to the US. Imagine two or three more of those countries in Nato.
Btw when the US does help, they do it the same way they issue a loan. Not only do you need to pay back that loan, but you also need to pay interest on it.
Firstly why didn't they ask during the 10 extra years when Assad was there? Why only now? Did they not have faith in China back then?
Secondly why should China intervene when we can see that the country's people themselves don't want to fight hard for it? In fact why should China be obligated to use force? Maybe there is some other way out? After all they keep saying China are pussies and not manly like Russia who shows its might so why should China change its methods just for them?
Now I see why Nato and those other organizations the west have only let in western Europeans and maybe vassal states like Japan. Because they don't want to risk having to bail out others and don't want troublemakers. Thats why they can pretend they always help coz they frankly never needed to help much in the first place. Afghanistan and Vietnam were bad enough to the US. Imagine two or three more of those countries in Nato.
Btw when the US does help, they do it the same way they issue a loan. Not only do you need to pay back that loan, but you also need to pay interest on it.
Very big loss for Russia and especially for Iran. A very big win for the US.
That Russian invasion of Ukraine will be looked at by historians as a transitional moment in world history.
That Russian invasion of Ukraine will be looked at by historians as a transitional moment in world history.
Maybe Prigozhin is not dead also
Russian General Calls U.S. Chairman of Joint Chiefs
This call took place on Nov 27th, quite a lot of coincidences
Getting weird pmc vibes from this post... strange...
I bolded the key words - this way the response should make total sense
Don't mind them. They are just bitter because so much effort and investment by Russia and Iran just went up to smokes with a single command by senile Biden
Imagine how many valuable and limited, economic, military, diplomatic resources, Russia invested to the Syrian theater. Tremendous waste, all gone in an instant
I remember them quite clearly in the past how much they were boasting and being smug. Now that their idiotic decisions have led to the present situation, they suddenly remember that they want China's help lol. FAFO
I mean, looking back he probably made up his mind about retiring a while ago, hence rejecting Iranian help despite having months to prepare and SAA not fighthing at all.
So why would he leave on the last flight and have his ADSB turned on for that matter, when Russian base is right there with full protection of Russian airforce? Plus that plane didn't even crash, it was a typical landing pattern.
