Miscellaneous News

GulfLander

Captain
Registered Member
"Ford’s planned job cuts in Germany provoked anger and tears at a staff meeting in Cologne on Wednesday (November 27), according to employees and the head of the automaker’s works council.

The U.S. carmaker plans 4,000 job cuts in Europe, including about 2,900 in Germany, 800 in Britain and 300 in other European Union countries.

The news of the Ford cuts comes just weeks after Volkswagen said it would trim employee pay by 10%. The German automaker plans to close at least three factories in its home country and lay off tens of thousands of staff.

Ford sales fell 15.3% in the first nine months of the year compared to the same period last year."

 

GulfLander

Captain
Registered Member
chrome_screenshot_Nov 29, 2024 1_14_11 PM GMT+08_00.png
. .....

"China declares modest new baselines around contested Scarborough Shoal, enclosing a much smaller strategic area than previously feared" by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

1732857790896.jpeg1732857861018.jpeg1732857885803.jpeg


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

What you think? Was there a change from before?
The writers seem to be affiliated w Aus university?

.....

 
Last edited:

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
View attachment 140201
"China declares modest new baselines around contested Scarborough Shoal, enclosing a much smaller strategic area than previously feared"

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

What you think? Was there a change from before?
Previously it was not made explicit weather 黄岩岛 is an island (per Chinese name) and therefore had 12nm territorial water around it or a shoal (per English name), which did not.

By explicitly announcing 黄岩岛 has a territorial baseline means this is also a declaration that the area within 12nm of the baseline is Chinese territorial waters and entering without permission or under innocent passage is a violation of Chinese sovereignty, with all the consequences that implies.

Neither 9 dash line nor Taiwan Strait are territorial waters (outside of actual territorial waters within 12nm of landmass in those zones), instead they are Chinese EEZ and innocent transit rule doesn't apply.
 

GulfLander

Captain
Registered Member
Previously it was not made explicit weather 黄岩岛 is an island (per Chinese name) and therefore had 12nm territorial water around it or a shoal (per English name), which did not.

By explicitly announcing 黄岩岛 has a territorial baseline means this is also a declaration that the area within 12nm of the baseline is Chinese territorial waters and entering without permission or under innocent passage is a violation of Chinese sovereignty, with all the consequences that implies.

Neither 9 dash line nor Taiwan Strait are territorial waters (outside of actual territorial waters within 12nm of landmass in those zones), instead they are Chinese EEZ and innocent transit rule doesn't apply.
Question, i read this unclos section recently:

"Article38
Right of transit passage

1. In straits referred to in article 37, all ships and aircraft enjoy the right of transit passage, which shall not be impeded; except that, if the strait is formed by an island of a State bordering the strait and its mainland, transit passage shall not apply if there exists seaward of the island a route through the high seas or through an exclusive economic zone of similar convenience with respect to navigational and hydrographical characteristics. "
It still follow the baseline?
Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zbb

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Question, i read this unclos section recently:

"Article38
Right of transit passage

1. In straits referred to in article 37, all ships and aircraft enjoy the right of transit passage, which shall not be impeded; except that, if the strait is formed by an island of a State bordering the strait and its mainland, transit passage shall not apply if there exists seaward of the island a route through the high seas or through an exclusive economic zone of similar convenience with respect to navigational and hydrographical characteristics. "
It still follow the baseline?
Thanks.
I'm pretty sure in Taiwan Straits case, even post reunification the parts of the strait that's more than 12nm away from land is still EEZ and allows innocent passage, despite what the article says. Shipping people can always argue "going around Taiwan is not 'similar convenience'".

Japan famously made their territorial waters extend only 3nm into the water around Tsugaru Strait so that they have an EEZ in the middle of the strait which allows US nuclear power ships to transit under innocent passage without entering Japanese territorial waters. And Tsugaru Strait is much more "enclosed" than Taiwan Strait.
 
Top