Miscellaneous News

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Why r they so interested in CN? Who owns the Economist?
The economist are basically British Anglo elites. As for why they’re so obsessed with China it’s because of the opium wars and the unequal treaties days; it’s like a creep who’s obsessed with a girl and keeps trying to go back to the days of when he had an abusive relationship with her when she has long moved on. This is where you get the Anglo American sentiment in the 50s that Eisenhower “lost China” to the CPC.

In fact judging by Anglo tourist behaviour in east Asia, this sentiment has not changed and will need to be rectified with mass castration and laogai of many Anglo aligned POWs, not to mention confiscation in perpetuity of the lands of the five eyes.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
The wordcelization of the American policymaking apparatus. Is there a single one of these people who took an introductory calculus course?
It is very Indian of them; in fact you may notice that loquacious ness and wordcelling is a key Indian trait.
Anothe the economist CN article.
"“In China’s system, Xi is in effect both pope and emperor—responsible for ruling, as well as promulgating ideological justifications that read like an obscurantist theological treatise from the Middle Ages.”" jon czin
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
...
The economist new correspondent in CN looking for tips.

View attachment 139893
once again, Anglo western projection. The west in the form of America wants the power of excommunication in the modern form of sanctions.
 

GulfLander

Junior Member
Registered Member
"The US and China are locked in a battle for tech supremacy, and it's set to be a major challenge for Donald Trump. Years of tariffs, export controls and financial sanctions have done little to slow Xi Jinping's quest for dominance. China has become a world leader in industries like electric vehicles and solar power, and it's catching up in others. But even though the US hasn't managed to trip China up yet, there's no sign it's going to stop trying."

....

Bloomberg promoting Japan?

 
Last edited:

iewgnem

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is who Alex Wong and his expertise on Grand Strategy along with his expertise on China.

View attachment 139941

Wong graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a bachelor's degree in English literature and French. He completed a J.D. from Harvard Law School where he was the managing editor of the Harvard Law Review and an editor of the Harvard International Law Journal. Wong clerked for the Janice Rogers Brown of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

What gives him the self-appointed insight about China's capabilities, intentions and supposed machinations to wage war against the U.S.? Does he even speak or read Chinese?
Regardless of his intentions, I think he's useful.

A United States that goes on a war of desperation against China, while ignoring overwhelming disadvantages, is what's needed if China were to take over the Pacific and solve for humanity the western barbarian problem once and for all, it's the same as what the trade war did for Chinese economic upgrade, and the tech war did to Chinese semiconductor surge.

The alternative where US come to their senses, abandons Taiwan, and fall back to bide their time in Cold War 2, while will still end in Chinese victory, and perhaps optimal from a humanitarian perspective at the local level, is not optimal from a historical and global perspective, as that will allow US to continue it's crimes against humanity for much longer, and a lot more people, people outside China, will suffer.
 
Top