People read incorrectly into what I was saying. I wasn't necessarily refering to the invasion of Taiwan or even fighting inside the 1st IC.
In which case OF COURSE PRC has a clear advantage! Anyone who thinks otherwise would obviously be clueless. Maybe Gordon C. may disagree but that's a seperate topic altogether.
It's like asking if the US will have an advantage if PRC decides to invade Cuba.
I was refering to an actual total war scenario between PRC and USA.
Anyway we've beaten this dead horse enough. I regret even posting about this topic in a place like this.
The people replies to you basically assume that the conflict between CN and the US is triggered by events within the first IC (Taiwan or the Korean Peninsula), and its main combat area is also within and near the first IC by default. Of course, the comparison of the main forces and delivery capabilities of the two sides is also based on the above-mentioned default. Therefore, in this thread discussion, the comprehensive confrontation at the national level of the US is prone to ambiguity. Perhaps other places outside these two regions become the main battlefield of CN-US confrontation itself is a "vacuum spherical chicken" problem.
Nobody thinks PLA is invulnerable. On the contrary, on the entire battlefield in the Western Pacific, every step forward of the PLA is cautiously walking on thin ice, and this situation may continue until around 2035. If the previous argument caused you discomfort, sorry to ignore it.
Nobody thinks PLA is invulnerable. On the contrary, on the entire battlefield in the Western Pacific, every step forward of the PLA is cautiously walking on thin ice, and this situation may continue until around 2035. If the previous argument caused you discomfort, sorry to ignore it.