Oops, just checking in on how's that dick measuring contest going?
Ladakh Flash Point
- Thread starter Mt1701d
- Start date
- Status
Very good, thank you.
Andi have provided evidences of China having Tents at PP14 past conflict. By your logic, Can I say China patrolled beyond PP14 into Indian perceived and traditional possessions ?
When did I say China didn't TEMPORARILY occupy pp14?
And it would be very difficult for China to patrol beyond it, considering there are two barriers: The Galwan and the wall India built on the other side of the bank.
Yes, you occupied pp14 for a few days, than pulled back 1 km while Indians resumed normal patrol ops while weather permitted. Congratulations on your victory.
I really hope everyone can put their frigid, oxygen deprived dicks back in their pants and get back to resolving their critical issues.
For India, China is really not the problem. What kind of adversary actively assist India in power generation and infrastructure? No one even comes close to Chinese quality and value in infrastructure.
You guys are rapidly missing the last train out of low skilled labor town.
As for China, they are far more focused on using this 5 year period to lay down the foundations of a new economy and technological ecosystem to come.
It is really sad that Indians don't see it that way. NOTHING can come out of a antagonizing what will be the global tech and economic leader.
The disengagement was mutual at PP14.A buffer zone was created that spans 3 km.
But you keep insisting India patrolled to PP14 after the disengagement has been signed and buffer zone created - based on Satellite images from March 2020 ( before or during conflict).
All i could get from Indian media
is that India will try to patrol upto PP14 after disengagement is complete.
Same outlook India keeps for Patrol point 2/3 to P8 in Pangong Tso.
So, ultimately, you are insisting that
1. Either India violated the disengagement agreement to create 3 km buffer zone.
2. Disengagement was short lived.
Weird .
I have already shown a satellite image of Indian camps about 500m from the clash site. Make of that what you will.
That specifically was a Dated one.
So India never signed a disengagement with China?
So no patrol zone of 3 km were created?
You are the one here insisting that India patrols until winter even after disengagement and creation of 3km buffer zone.
You may have to provide newer and better evidences for that. If India did patrol, by the heft of the "evidences" you supply then I can insist China replied in kind and what more China patrolled beyond PP14 (for a time being since China had tents at PP14 for some time).
Not understanding your position here.
Last edited:
Forget it mate. The Indians logic is insane. He keeps posting the same stuff after you have debunked him. He doesn't or refused to get it.
1. His 'evidence' is not evidence.
2. Images of evidence are of wrong date
3. He refused to accept evidence to the contrary
4. He don't understand no one cares who 'wins'.
5. China don't care about them, China is pursuing other objectives.
6. His India is obsessed with China.
7. India only borders with a handful of countries, yet have conflict with almost everyone. Yet, in his head, China is the aggressive one. Kind of figures, doesn't it?
So what counts as evidence then? He has presented no evidence to counter my arguements, only Indian media articles from dubious sources.
- Status