after initial clashes both sides were trying to beat each other with greater numbers also there are videos of chinese soldiers more in numbers pushing indian soldiers back.
Let's see those videos of Chinese soldiers outnumbering Indians ones. At Galwan?
i think chinese technology/drones sci-fi gadgets failed to locate large no. of advancing IA.
They should be more careful in the future, and more importantly, not assume that the IA can follow standards of modern engagement. They are prone to ambushing small unarmed negotiating teams. We know now.
Blaming IA for attacking PLA is wrong after PLA did same to IA initially.
How far back are you reaching this time? 1962? You've talked about Kublai Khan before so there really is no telling...
we know chinese army awarded 4 soldiers but my question is what is the number of soldiers not awarded any medals??
Those 4 died and were awarded for their sacrifice, and for holding off 200 enemies. But in general, China doesn't award soldiers for killing IA; that's not enough for a valor medal. You have to defeat competent enemies for that.
shamed by china for what r?
What r? I thought the British taught you better English than that... You need it for call center work. Anyway, how about ambushing an unarmed 5-man negotiating team, and then losing, both the actual fight, and in casualty numbers, as well as POWs? That's not that shameful for the IA compared to normal operations, right?
he broke skull of PLA officer wide open and that is shameful thing for PLA not Indian army.
Nice try but epic fail. Captain Rangamei was awarded with a Gallantry medal long before China released the video. Here is the announcement from 25th Jan where he was listed among gallantry medal reciepients. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1692350 Would the epic fail be a slight...
www.sinodefenceforum.com
I don't care about what IA said after Galwan clashes.
Yeah, there's a lot of things you need to not care about to keep going.
I like the fact that IA was agressive
I like that India can never improve because it always invents excuses to call its failures successes.
Aggressive is an interesting word to use; I guess you can be opportunistically aggressive and cowardly together. If you want to be aggressive, that's totally fine; China's ready to rumble. Seeing the quality of those soldiers a Galwan, you can come over and play anytime. But you don't dare; you can only ambush, in peace time. Cowardly ambushes like that happen only once, before your opponent knows you too well to let it happen again. This isn't a ninja ambush where you used stealth and cunning; this one relied on the other side trusting that you have some degree of civility. When that trust is lost, India can do nothing.
and IA soldiers broke skull of loudmouth PLA officer.
Nice try but epic fail. Captain Rangamei was awarded with a Gallantry medal long before China released the video. Here is the announcement from 25th Jan where he was listed among gallantry medal reciepients. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1692350 Would the epic fail be a slight...
www.sinodefenceforum.com
You saw video of IA trying to save PLA soldiers after giving nice thrashing and a captured PLA Vehicle? I say IA showing dominance over PLA I.
Over 1 person? How about the 20 IA who died, the 60+ that were captured, and who the 100+ who ran when there was a real fight? That one doesn't count towards India's imaginary world of dominance, right? LOL
Pakistan brag about smallest of achievements.
Indians brag about about achievements they invented out of defeat and humiliation.
While India carved out a new country out of pakistan and retured 90+K of Pakistani POW.
I think all of Pakistan was carved out of India.
Pakistan is just a nuisance for India they feel accomplished when Indian listen to them.
All we need to do is ignore those retards.
Yeah, you ignore it when they shoot down your jet by calling your own jet and pilot a disposable tin can.
Do you think 70 of them golgappas can beat 600 Indian soldiers?
Don't know what a golgappa is but in general, Indian armed forces tend to kill themselves accidentally so there's no real answer to the question of how many it takes to kill 600 of them. It depends on the level of screw up seen that day from the IA.
Question is why PLA want to negotiate with India and decides to move back but do opposite in South china sea.
Because India is not important enough to truly put resources into countering while the SCS involves the US, which is a real adversary you don't want to be distracted from when engaging.
Is PLA afraid of formidable opponent?
It's proper procedure to be more careful around
You dont negotiate with the enemy who encroaches on your territory and now trying to justify.
That's exactly what India did.
I say treatment by IA is justified.
Cowardice is only "justified" by lack of character, not by circumstance.
Blame PLA for running away leaving behind so called negotiator, it was their job to protect him.
Apparently you don't know what happened. Everyone protected the negotiating commander, so they died; 1 guy left to call for reinforcements. And then it was all Indian running from there on out.
But like always blame enemy for your own mistakes and start crying, making propaganda videos. I mean who does this?
India. Everyday. LOL
laughing and bringing caste,poverty into discussion will not increase your iq.
Inventing victories out of defeat and attempting to justify cowardly ambushes only unarmed negotiating teams will not decrease India's failures.
