I can only see 2 reasons why India is silent about the pictures and videos.
1. India has only have embarrassing footage from the Galwan clash
2. China captured the Indian soldiers and took their cameras and phones away
Ladakh Flash Point
- Thread starter Mt1701d
- Start date
- Status
1. India has only have embarrassing footage from the Galwan clash
2. China captured the Indian soldiers and took their cameras and phones away
If the latter happened then the videos are of an embarrassing nature anyway.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
I'm afraid that pretending to be bad at reading isn't a strategy to win a debate. It has been explained many times; I know an Indian's English can't be that bad except on purpose. China captured your territory first, then when you promised to be good, gave a little back. And if you act up, you will lose it again and more. Unfortunately for you, you can't simplify everything to be "at the same time" just because understanding sequence of events is too complicated for you.
The troops were forced only by the CCP's orders, because there is no force in India... except against other Indians. Whatever you have, you have by our mercy. Our temporary mercy conditional upon your behavior.
Indians always have low standards, and when they fail to reach it, they still say they got what they wanted to achieve anyway. It upholds your dignity in exchange for complacency over real life failure. That's general Indian culture and why India started higher than China decades ago and is now a gnome to China's colossus.
Status quo restored in Indian's troll minds so they can live on with a false sense of dignity. Loss of every conflict against China and Pakistan in real life.
Except China's perception is beyond the buffer zone, which was a compromise. China initially asked India to vacate the entire Galwan valley, vacate Dhan SIngh Thapa, and stop building infrastructure in Chinese claimed territory. India refused all those demands, which is why there was a stalemate until India occupied heights on the southern bank. It was China that had to withdraw on the Pangong north bank and dismantle infrastructure. That is the exact opposite of a "fait accompli"
Also, the pangong conflict started nearly a month before the Galwan conflict. And satellite imagery clearly show Chinese troops, as seen in the video, attempted to cross the lac and build structures in previously undisputed territory that it now claims in its 1959 line.
I see you are stillt rying to cope with the fact PLA had to retreat from its own territory, as per its own 1959 claim line.
Anyway, it's hilarious how China is doing exactly what they say India is doing, retreating from its own claimed territory. If that is a defeat for India adn positive for China, I guess India does not need victories.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Everything you wrote here is you trying to cope with being Indian. I see you cannot write any point-to-point rebuttal as I always do because of a combination of mental inability and deprivation of ammunition due to pathetic national performance.
It's hilarious how Indian beggars create an alternate universe in their minds in which they took by force the meager things they were given and command the respect of others through their competence and achievements when actually, in military circles, India is basically a poor version of Saudi Arabia buying top dollar for foreign stuff then running it into the ground.
There is no if. It is, and the reason that India doesn't need victories is because Indians have convinced themselves to stop pining after what you cannot have anyway. Rather, an imaginary version will do.
No, religions are prevalent in India. Science is prevalent in ChinaI would like to know is Jainism prevalent in China ?
Before I get removed from this forum
Apparently this Indian gives the reason for no videos from the Indian side. I believe him "110%".
Going by your assertion, prior to India gaining advantage in South Pangong Tso, China held all advantage. Which is true because China was able to push back India from P8-P4-toP2/3 and gain advantage most of the areas north.
But then that would mean no clear path for disengagement. It could lead to a hot war especially up North of Pangong Tso.
Do you think either China or India would've simply relented to the unilateral demands from either side? If anything, the least violent solution would be a lukewarm border always in an active state of confrontation - Much like India-Pakistan border.
Such a situation is not of interest to China.
China indeed demanded entire regions be evacuated fully cognizant of the realistic solutions it could expect.
And thus China kept discipline as down South, India inserted itself, with mechanized regiments, into the Kailash ranges relatively unopposed. China didn't bother to oppose, almost as if China wanted India to gain a card so as to make the idea of disengagement possible (and digestible to the masses).
With the Pangong Tso agreement, China forced India to hand in the Kailash "pass" entirely ( that China "gave" it) and IA had to retreat from Kailash ranges.
If India gained Kailash ranges over hard fighting with China, it wouldn't have traded it as readily. But it did. That's a question you might want to ask Indian leadership itself.
When viewed together with the aggression at Galwan, China's action can be seen to be focused on increasing pressure at areas North of Pangong Tso and laying groundworks for future buildup there. Because that's the region that holds the key to Siachen Glacier, Karakoram pass and Tibet - Xinjiang, China Pakistan economic Corridor.
Last edited:
An excuse devoid of any logic. Why should India oblige to China's request when China had the nerve to publish images and videos showing Indian soldiers dead and squirming?
Quite disappointing if the Indian masses buy this tweet as is.
Oh captive videos where are you...
The Indian Army is not only not releasing their video, but maintaining complete silence. If we play reverse uno and apply their logic since June 15th -- what is the IA hiding?
Last edited:
- Status