Ladakh Flash Point

twineedle said:

Are you denying that the 1992 lac agreement runs through finger 4, as clearly demarcated by google maps? Are you even aware India and China signed an agreement in 1992?

Click to expand...

Xsizor said:

No. I don't think I am aware of a 1992 agreement. You may entertain the fellow members of this thread with your knowledge about 1992 agreement and how China has violated it.

There is however a 1993 agreement.

Click to expand...

manqiangrexue said:

No, they have the mindset of success; you have the mindset of complaining. You keep it to yourself.

Oh ok, I didn't know what that meant until you wrote it twice, once in capital letters. Idiot.

China is powerful indeed and still threading softly, because it is still growing immensely. Any conflicts that may arise now, would serve China if they arose in the future instead. China currently has a system that works, as it develops in every sector to be a world leader. Perhaps some changes can make this even faster, but perhaps those changes can stop this pattern. Given that, the correct risk assessment is to continue on the same course if you can because that leads to victory. The desperate will do anything for change because they hope change can reverse their doomed fortunes. That's not China; China wants continuation because its future is bright and successful as it is. If it gambles, it risks losing all only for a chance to win a little earlier. That's not worth it.

All soft power is built on hard power. Hard power is the stage, the microphone, for soft power. If your stage and your equipment are still less than the stage that dominates the world narrative (the USA/West), the correct solution is not to yell louder in vain. Build your power, build your stage and equipment until it becomes the loudest. Then leave your opponent hopelessly drowned in your volume.

I think there were at least several times where it was explained to you why the information was delayed. You're just making up crap now because you still want to argue a dead point ignoring what was already said.

Mind the business of your own country. Who is hired and who is fired in China is for China to decide. You need to disinvest yourself if you are not Chinese. Minding another country's internal affairs is like telling other people how to raise their very successful kids.

Already have as most people see here.

Click to expand...

sukhoi_30MKI said:

there is no such thing as absolute freedom of speech, abuse cannot be freedom of speech.
Freedom of speech comes with responsibilities.

Click to expand...

sukhoi_30MKI said:

How many points cpc gives to ugyer people for keeping calm and obey even though their rights are taken away?

Click to expand...

longmarch said:

Look up what you buddy Hu Xinjin said, and the speeches of your family planning officials at international meetings. It's disgusting.

Click to expand...

siegecrossbow said:

He is probably referring to the use of guns in September 2020. Both sides were nebulous about what transpired but given how vocal the IA is about any of their supposed victories, silence isn’t a good sign.

Click to expand...

siegecrossbow said:

I don't think the Chinese directors are up to the challenge of making the Jawans look formidable. If they make the movie exactly as it happened in history, moviegoers will decry details of 3 PLA soldiers capturing an entire Indian artillery brigade as "unrealistic".

Click to expand...

longmarch said:

Apparently you are not the smart ones.

You expect people to mind their own business when genocide is happening in Xinjiang, as 5 eyes have been claiming?

Have some self-esteem and defend it, instead of "mind your own business". Give your deceased full honour WHEN it's deserved.

上兵伐谋 其次伐交 其次伐兵 其下攻城

And you are happily counting the loss of soldiers. Pathetic.

Click to expand...