Wrong analogy since both PAF and PLAAF still use Chengdu J-7 as cheap cannon fodders. Which one do you rhink will affect PLAAF more psychologically in a skirmish with USAF, a J-7 tin can getting knocked out or a J-10C.
Why do you think till 2019 atleast we placed Mig 21 is all bases closes to Pakistan border such as Srinagar or Pathankot??? It is because we know they will take losses in the initial skirmish and hence it is better if we loose a MiG rather than a Sukhois or Mirage 2000
Firstly even western think tanks have admitted that if India missed it was only because of difference in coordinates system between GPS and Indian maps. Nearest PAF interceptors were a 100 miles away as per Indian commander
Talk is cheap. Despite outnumbering IAF 4th gen defenders 6:1, PAF could not shoot a single one.
In real war where it is PAF who will be outnumbered most of the time, this is very bad news for PAF.
And as per PAF, interceptors were already on the way before Indian Mirages shat themselves and ran. A credible claim since that's also precisely what they did the next day. Being out of range of F-16s and still panicking + running doesn't help your case at all.
You can pick and choose your sources all you want, but expect to be ridiculed as a result. Some Western think tanks say this and so we must believe it, nonono not THOSE Western think tanks. Quote from wiki:
Analysis of open-source satellite imagery by the
's Digital Forensics Laboratory,
San Francisco-based
,
European Space Imaging,
and the
,
has concluded that India did not hit any targets of significance on the Jaba hilltop site in the vicinity of Balakot.
And no, Indian commanders have lost all credibility on this issue. I've said this before so please pay attention. If people are doubting claims from IAF sources and you have a problem with that, go take it up with those commanders and tell them to stop lying so much next time because their lies are seriously making you look like a fool on internet forums.
As for J-10C vs J-7 knocked out, consider this option: how about neither get knocked out without retaliation? Arguably, a J-7 getting shot down would create more outrage because Chinese citizens would actually be asking the real questions, like "Why are we still using 1960s-era jets to intercept our greatest rival?"
You absolutely would not see such an attitude of "whatever at least they ONLY shot down a J-7, not like they shot down a J-10C anyway", because that quickly slips into "woops they actually splashed a J-10C this time, at least it wasn't our J-......okay yeah now they swatted our J-20 too". That's just big-time loser behaviour, and I am not sure why you need this explained to you for like the third time now. Having ANYTHING shot down is unacceptable even if it is a cardboard glider, and anything less than at least a proportionate response WILL be seen as proof of weakness
6:1 advantage and still getting slapped. All the more reason to recognize Pakistan's resolve and competence over IAF who couldn't use this massive advantage to even shoot down a PAF third-generation Mirage let alone a fourth-generation JF or F-16. Talk is cheap alright, and certainly cheaper than a modernized MiG-21 for sure. That's why Indian pundits and nationalists can only dish out talk and more talk. If you dished out more R-73s instead maybe you can actually score a kill next time.
The real bad news here is that all those Cope India exercises with the USAF clearly don't pay off even slightly. Which sucks for me too because I used to love crapping on F-15s by using Cope India 2004 as an example of them getting owned by MiG-21s, and now I can't do that on comment sections anymore without someone bringing this up. Thanks a lot.