This isn't some random Indian guy spouting his mouth. This is a senior Indian politician in the BJP basically saying that war is inevitable.
Here's why the LAC issue won't lead to a permanent border treaty:
1. India will have to relinquish its claim to the entirety of Aksai Chin if it settles the border at the LAC.
2. India does not want to relinquish its claim to Aksai Chin because...
3. India knows China will obviously not give up Aksai Chin since National Highway G219 runs right through, amongst other reasons such as it has been under Chinese control since the 1950s which is consistent with the fact that...
4. India does not actually want to settle a border treaty with China since it is hoping to facilitate an independent Tibet at some point in the future.
To be honest, I am not so sure that China (Xi Jinping) is not also goading India into starting a war with China because:
5. There will not be any border treaty signed in the near (or distant) future without a change in Indian psyche (hmm), and so
6. China will continue to have a un-demarcated border with an India that is eyeing for its chance in Tibet, unless
7. somehow internal unrest within India allows independent Northeast and Kashmir to occur, but that is unlikely because India does have a large military and ability to suppress 'ethinic' minorities such as 'muslims' and 'chinkies' without electoral repercussions.
8. COVID 19 has presented a once in a century opportunity
This is what I've been getting at all along in my posts:
8. By placing the decision for escalation in India's hands, China is almost daring India to start a war, which China would rather not fight, but also would not mind finding, in order to settle an issue that would otherwise have no near term resolution and would continue to a thorn in China's back as it seeks to further expand its global ambitions.