Your write a long, boring essay that is actually just a merry go round of conjecture, conspiracy, and unrelated facts. Let me shorten all of it down to just two words: Pure nonsense! I will not be dragged into a debate of pure nonsense with you.Calm down, no need to be confrontational.
What you are pointing out does not support your point nor your narrative:
1. GM is a company. Like I said, companies are always on path for growth and expansion. They will have to expand to underdeveloped areas whether there is an India hype or not, that's just the nature of capitalism. It's not like corporations never think about expansion into new market until one new market is under a government that does all the PR to lure them in. And it is also true that a lot of their ventures will turn out unsuccessful. You will learn this as soon as you learn business history.
2. So what? Everyone knows it is scam. Business scams happens in all countries, how does that support your point that "major countries including the West, China and Russia are fooled and scammed by India"? Which major country bought into Jio 5G?
3. Sure, but what's your point? Government needs to do things, whether there is any room for them to do anything meaningful or not. This still does NOT support your point that India fooled the rest of the world by their "Make in India". If you read enough history, you will know that there are no shortage of similarly ambitious, hyped-up but eventually fruitless political campaigns in human history. This is common in politics.
4. Don't be an infant by throwing that "Cold War" term around, especially with capital letters. This is juvenile behavior. Do you even know what the Cold War is? Ladakh is nothing to China. China didn't even mobilize much of her second line forces in Western Theatre Command. This is nothing. How on earth does this constitute a "Cold War"?
5. This is confusing point you are making. Covid-19 spread widely in India just like how everyone expected. Western countries have always been saying that India will have a huge pandemic, long before India's numbers actually surged. How on earth does this support your narrative that India "fooled the world"?
If you believe the whole narrative that India fooled the entire world, you would have already been brainwashed by Western propaganda. Because it is the same kind that kept on insisting that they "made China great by trading with China“, hence pretending to do this whole "decoupling with China" thing, that is obviously a hoax.
Because capitalism is always on a outreach for expansion, Western capitals have always wanted to enter China (as well as all other markets they don't have access to). The "改革开放" and the US-China normalization of relationship is only an event that allowed the Western capitals to pour in. But your logic, China also wooed the Western capital in. The only difference is that China delivered (to be precise, there have been a handful of very difficult economic situations in China since1980, the sustain high growth on happened after 2000) while India did not, looking back from today.
One way the Western propaganda works is by passing foundational ideas as a priori "truth" in subtlety. This is more powerful than direct brainwashing. Because people subject to these would think that they came up with those thoughts themselves. While in reality, the ideas and thoughts base upon which they came up with their thoughts are not theirs. This is the problem I have with your narrative.
Your narrative first assume that nations/countries are the exact same creatures as individual human beings. They are NOT. You have to first understands how nations/countries work before you use such infantile terms as "trustworthiness". This term contains the motivation to fool voters into thinking that any negative impact of their government's miscalculation and lack of competitiveness if not their own fault/shortcoming, but the fault of their opponents being "untrustworthy". The thing is, diplomacy and realpolitik NEVER work upon "trustworthiness", they work upon "predictability": it is not because one government trust another, but rather because they have a reliable enough mechanism of predicting the future actions of the other government to a certain quantifiable degree of accuracy.
STOP NOW!