INDIA'S STRATEGIC DISADVANTAGE IN INDUSTRIAL WORKFORCE PRODUCTIVITY.
India's flawed education and caste system places it at a severe strategic disadvantage as compared to China.
The biggest shortfall India has is in a trained and literate industrial workforce. While "engineering colleges" as discussed before produce clerks and "babus" there is a critical shortage of trained trade persons ( Example : Hydraulics systems mechanics for maintenance of construction equipment ) because India has not invested in Trade Schools, and Polytechnics, nor is there an active industrial internship programs. The workforce consists of " experience by work only " unorganized labor. So going back to the example of a hydraulics system mechanic, a person such as this will have minimum literacy and cannot read a schematic. The person will have acquired some proficiency based on trial and error on a particular product say a wheeled front end loader of a particular make but will take a long time to adjust to maintaining a piece of military equipment with a similar hydraulic system.
Southern India with its much higher literacy and reduced caste barriers does do an adequate job training industrial manpower through Trade Schools but ironically the prime objective ( particularly in the state of Kerala) is to provide manpower for export to the Middle East of elsewhere. So a certified welder is much more likely to seek employment in Dubai than in a naval shipyard.
Worst of all is the fact that industrial manpower in India has a severe gender disparity. A female welder or crane operator, a common sight in China is rarely if ever seen in India.
The Indian shop floor work environment offers no protection against harassment.
With a "babu" culture the West has India right where it wants it, heavily dependent on outsourced clerical jobs, and fast slipping in self sufficiency in key defence and critical technoloies.