I like to explore the what-ifs. What if China change it's nuclear doctrine and begin vastly expand it's nulcear Arsenal to reach Russia or US level, or more . including both tactical and strategic nuclear weapons. That's including few hundred DF41 and JL3. Once that's achieved. It would promote first use doctrine.
What if China use low yield tactical nuke on its border conflict with India.
Would India willing to match up to this? Tactical nuke exchange at the border?
How would it deal with China new found vast strategic nuclear weaponries?
Would it concern getting out of hand with the not too far new Delhi?
This would completely change the dynamic. It would pose a serious existential threat to country like India. No amount of Quad alliance or allies with US and choke point of Chinese merchant ships can deal with this.
China new first use strategy would change the dynamic of containment game. Its not about containment anymore but dealibg with grave threat of being wiping off from face of the earth.
This is using more deadly poison to kill poison.
Using threat of nuclear exchange to break containment
What if China use low yield tactical nuke on its border conflict with India.
Would India willing to match up to this? Tactical nuke exchange at the border?
How would it deal with China new found vast strategic nuclear weaponries?
Would it concern getting out of hand with the not too far new Delhi?
This would completely change the dynamic. It would pose a serious existential threat to country like India. No amount of Quad alliance or allies with US and choke point of Chinese merchant ships can deal with this.
China new first use strategy would change the dynamic of containment game. Its not about containment anymore but dealibg with grave threat of being wiping off from face of the earth.
This is using more deadly poison to kill poison.
Using threat of nuclear exchange to break containment
Last edited: