Ladakh Flash Point

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
43 PLA soldiers are dead you should calm down your tits. Those are needed somewhere else right now not here. ;)

... how does one "calm down" tits? You understand how tits work right? Have you ever seen them?

By the way, I asked you what happened to the "escalation" you promised... ?
 

Figaro

Senior Member
Registered Member
43 PLA soldiers are dead you should calm down your tits. Those are needed somewhere else right now not here. ;)
The fact that you keep quoting an already debunked number from an unreliable source for the Chinese casualty figure is mind boggling ... are you really this stubborn? Hopefully the Indian army isn't like you otherwise I fear if they attempt something like this again, shooting and firing would happen. IMO, the Indian army has learned its lesson and knows the negotiating table is the best place to confront the Chinese ... I doubt it would attempt to do this again.
 

berserk

Junior Member
Registered Member
The fact that you keep quoting an already debunked number from an unreliable source for the Chinese casualty figure is mind boggling ... are you really this stubborn? Hopefully the Indian army isn't like you otherwise I fear if they attempt something like this again, shooting and firing would happen. IMO, the Indian army has learned its lesson and knows the negotiating table is the best place to confront the Chinese ... I doubt it would attempt to do this again.
Debunked by who? LMAO! go ask CCP to release PLA fatalities number first .India is not obliged to accept Chinese numbers until CCP release count of there fatalities which they are avoiding for good reasons.
Chinese people need to know about the number of there soldiers killed....at least think about the motherd whose only children were lost :(
 

Figaro

Senior Member
Registered Member
Debunked by who? LMAO! go ask CCP to release PLA fatalities number first .India is not obliged to accept Chinese numbers until CCP release count of there fatalities which they are avoiding for good reasons.
Chinese people need to know about the number of there soldiers killed....at least think about the motherd whose only children were lost :(
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
By one of your own sources ... and yet we do not know the true extent of the Indian dead either. There are reports claiming that there as many as 50 dead Indian soldiers. Luckily India still has reporters who are willing to seek the truth rather than be brainwashed by an obvious lie ...
 

jfy1155

Junior Member
Registered Member
Debunked by who? LMAO! go ask CCP to release PLA fatalities number first .India is not obliged to accept Chinese numbers until CCP release count of there fatalities which they are avoiding for good reasons.
Chinese people need to know about the number of there soldiers killed....at least think about the motherd whose only children were lost :(
This is your Indian media latest claim number back to unknown
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

berserk

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
By one of your own sources ... and yet we do not know the true extent of the Indian dead either. There are reports claiming that there as many as 50 dead Indian soldiers. Luckily India still has reporters who are willing to seek the truth rather than be brainwashed by an obvious lie ...
Did you even read it? India has made a 43 soldiers casualty claim on PLA side based on intercept assessment and 20 fatalities on ours. US intelligence assessment is 35 PLA dead. only one who is not disclosing anything is CCP I wonder why.
 

discspinner

Junior Member
Registered Member

oh man, this video explains the strategic and tactical rationale for China's actions so clearly. Unfortunately, it is only in Chinese. Essentially it says the following:
1. the DBSO road is a dead end road from Leh up to Daulet Beg Oldie adjacent to the Depsang Plains, an area where mechanized vehicles and armor can operate, and where Indian has a major garrison.
2. the DBSO road follows the Shyok river up to DBO
3. the only path into the Shyok river valley is the Galwan river valley, and thus a natural place for total entrapment of all Indian forces north of the river, as the Karakoram range and Siachen Glacier block off the northern and western borders
4. in 1962, Chinese forces advanced past the Shyok river, but withdrew 20km, across the Shyok river confluence with the Galwan river.
5. the tacit understanding for a long time has been that the LAC between the two sides included the entirety of the Galwan river valley up to the confluence of the Galwan and Shyok river. Indeed, India had never set up camps or roads across the Shyok river into the Galwan valley
6. until last year, when a bridge was constructed that did exactly that...09:00 - 09:30
 

jfy1155

Junior Member
Registered Member
Did you even read it? India has made a 43 soldiers casualty claim on PLA side based on intercept assessment and 20 fatalities on ours. US intelligence assessment is 35 PLA dead. only one who is not disclosing anything is CCP I wonder why.
Do you know how to read?

" Therefore, ANI’s tweet on alleged casualties on the Chinese side, both dead and injured, was misrepresented by many as “43 Chinese soldiers killed” in the skirmish. It is also noteworthy that neither the Chinese side nor any prominent Indian defence journalist has confirmed the number of casualties in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). "
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top