JH-7/JH-7A/JH-7B Thread

[challenge]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

last year. there are report a new suppose "stealth" version or LOA variant twin engine fighter already make her maiden flight.
the aircraft designate Sin-93 or new-93.design to replace JH-7
but to date, it still no officially confirm.
J-10 make her maiden flight march 23, 1998, it was not until around 2002 ,5 years after her first flight was the image was officially release to the media.

 

[Deino]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

And what does that tell us ?? ... once again - at least for the moment - only rumors.

But if You add the info that the XXJ was once called Sin-93 or new-93 ... I tend to say that there are currently other projects with higher priority running at XAC and that this JH-XX or JH-7B or what-ever it is called ... is only a project at best.

Deino

 

[challenge]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

And what does that tell us ?? ... once again - at least for the moment - only rumors.

But if You add the info that the XXJ was once called Sin-93 or new-93 ... I tend to say that there are currently other projects with higher priority running at XAC and that this JH-XX or JH-7B or what-ever it is called ... is only a project at best.

Deino

repeat" not official confirm".

 

[Deino]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

repeat" not official confirm".

But the problem is: You always post such "reports" and some might think that type already flew and is simply not confirmed at the moment. IMO this is dangerous or at least problematic especially since most of "Your" rumours are simply are not correct (see Tu-22M-3 report).

Deino

 

[RedMercury]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

It wouldn't be called sin-93, that's not even proper ping yin.

 

[challenge]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

But the problem is: You always post such "reports" and some might think that type already flew and is simply not confirmed at the moment. IMO this is dangerous or at least problematic especially since most of "Your" rumours are simply are not correct (see Tu-22M-3 report).

Deino

the "rumor" in fact was translated from a russian arm forces newspaper.
and posted in the Chinese web site.
tu-22m3 may be cold war relic and expensive to maintain, but it got the range,bombload and a lot potential for improvement.same as B-1A to B-1b.
reducing tu-22m3 overall RCS. and upgraded with AESA radar .and 4 smaller conformal AESA to provide aircraft 360 deg. detection range.

 

[Deino]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

the "rumor" in fact was translated from a russian arm forces newspaper.
and posted in the Chinese web site.
..

And that's exactly the point:

WHAT DOES THE RUSSIAN MILITARY AND ESP: SOME NEWSPAPERS DO KNOW ABOUT THE CHINESE MILITARY AND ESP: SECRET PROJECT ????

NOTHING !!! ... And You are once again post these BS and "propose" a reality that does not exist.

I also find a lot of such stuff in the net ... everyone can do that ... but before You post such "rumours" just start to think if the content could be real and what's the source. Here I would say 1 + 1 = 7 ! And so I leave it.

Deino



PS:

tu-22m3 may be cold war relic and expensive to maintain, but it got the range,bombload and a lot potential for improvement.same as B-1A to B-1b.
reducing tu-22m3 overall RCS. and upgraded with AESA radar .and 4 smaller conformal AESA to provide aircraft 360 deg. detection range.

Keep on dreaming ! Yes ... its all possible ... but would it make sense ??

 

[rhino123]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

And that's exactly the point:

WHAT DOES THE RUSSIAN MILITARY AND ESP: SOME NEWSPAPERS DO KNOW ABOUT THE CHINESE MILITARY AND ESP: SECRET PROJECT ????

NOTHING !!! ... And You are once again post these BS and "propose" a reality that does not exist.

I also find a lot of such stuff in the net ... everyone can do that ... but before You post such "rumours" just start to think if the content could be real and what's the source. Here I would say 1 + 1 = 7 ! And so I leave it.

Deino



PS:

Keep on dreaming ! Yes ... its all possible ... but would it make sense ??

And I can bet that Challenge's bullshit sources (his so-call chinese site) are from the wforum, which time and again have been proofed wrong.

The reason I am writing this is not that I wanted to answer to Challenge's bullshit and keep that troll going on... but to increase some awareness among newer members who would think what he said is accurate since he had 1k+ posts.

 

[Semi-Lobster]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

And I can bet that Challenge's bullshit sources (his so-call chinese site) are from the wforum, which time and again have been proofed wrong.

The reason I am writing this is not that I wanted to answer to Challenge's bullshit and keep that troll going on... but to increase some awareness among newer members who would think what he said is accurate since he had 1k+ posts.

Yah, I don't know what's going on exactly, challenge used to make some pretty good posts but nowadays they all seem to be related to supposed 'hot scoops about XXX super secret planes' with absolutely no source

 

[challenge]

Re: JH-7/JH-7A Thread

But the problem is: You always post such "reports" and some might think that type already flew and is simply not confirmed at the moment. IMO this is dangerous or at least problematic especially since most of "Your" rumours are simply are not correct (see Tu-22M-3 report).

Deino

deino , semi lobster and rhino 123, you better eat your own word, CNN , Fox and shenzhen based Phoenix TV did confirm about the TU-22m-3 deal.
so much for "BS".