JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
.... confusing report from Janes:

"Meanwhile, the PAF revealed that after a lengthy evaluation the air-cooled Nanjing Research Institute of Electronics Technology (NRIET) KLJ-7A active electronically scanned-array (AESA) radar has been selected for the Block III variant of the JF-17/ FC-1 Xiaolong, the first prototype of which made its maiden flight on 17 December from CAIG's production facility at Chengdu-Huangtianba. PAC Kamra's newly appointed chairman, Air Marshal Syed Noman Ali, said a second Block III prototype will assist in May with the test and evaluation process."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Maybe this explains the delay of radar selection... they were waiting for NRIET to develop an aircooled version to match AVIC.
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
.... confusing report from Janes:

"Meanwhile, the PAF revealed that after a lengthy evaluation the air-cooled Nanjing Research Institute of Electronics Technology (NRIET) KLJ-7A active electronically scanned-array (AESA) radar has been selected for the Block III variant of the JF-17/ FC-1 Xiaolong, the first prototype of which made its maiden flight on 17 December from CAIG's production facility at Chengdu-Huangtianba. PAC Kamra's newly appointed chairman, Air Marshal Syed Noman Ali, said a second Block III prototype will assist in May with the test and evaluation process."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Maybe this explains the delay of radar selection... they were waiting for NRIET to develop an aircooled version to match AVIC.

I think it is a case of confusion and not the first time Janes has made a glaring mistake either. Janes also reported that the J-20 uses a variant of KLJ-7A, which is impossible.
 

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
I think it is a case of confusion and not the first time Janes has made a glaring mistake either. Janes also reported that the J-20 uses a variant of KLJ-7A, which is impossible.

Yea that would make more sense... i guess that would leave the question still open as to what radar was actually selected... the "air cooled" AVIC or the KLJ7A
 

Zahid

Junior Member
I think it is a case of confusion and not the first time Janes has made a glaring mistake either. Janes also reported that the J-20 uses a variant of KLJ-7A, which is impossible.
Ummm..... Alan Warnes confirmed that this was not a mistake. If he is wrong, then he has been given wrong information from the top hierarchy of PAF - conceivable, but not probable.
 

stannislas

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ummm..... Alan Warnes confirmed that this was not a mistake. If he is wrong, then he has been given wrong information from the top hierarchy of PAF - conceivable, but not probable.
Reporter wrong all the time, it’s almost twice the size for j-20 radar comparing with jf-17, also 14th institute produce so many different type for pla, air-cooled just one of those
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I think it is a case of confusion and not the first time Janes has made a glaring mistake either. Janes also reported that the J-20 uses a variant of KLJ-7A, which is impossible.

But that wasn't me! ;)
 

by78

General
Spec sheet for the AURORA HUD for the Block-III prototype.

49556987902_2d85f236b2_o.jpg

49556752171_94cc2ac6d5_o.jpg
 
Top