JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

D

delft

Brigadier
Zahid said:
Sir, it is a two-way traffic. In early to mid-90s there was a lot of sectarian violence with equal support provided by Iran. Low-key sectarian violence is still taking place, and Iranian-supported groups are on the losing end, generally.

Iranians have been recruiting volunteers from Parachinar (adjoining Afghanistan) to fight in Syria. However, I will concede that in the past years monetary support from GCC has emboldened some groups to support violence inside Iran. But then it is not purely a matter of terrorism as such, since Iranian Mullahs suppress Sunnis who predominate in certain areas such as Sistan (Baloch areas under Iranian control). Balochistan is sparsely populated and poorly governed and Pakistan find it difficult to secure the border and cut cross-border movement.

There are other issues such as Iranian tacit support for Indian-sponsored subversion inside Pakistan, Crime bosses from Karachi traveling on Iranian passports, generally hostile Iranian policies on International fora, etc...

In this context, one can place the latest incident of JF-17 being used to kill the Iranian drone deep inside Pakistan's air-space. If Iranians had wanted a partner in peace, there would have been a positive engagement from Pakistan, since Pakistanis generally view Iran favorably. From the Iranian side, though it seems to be a different story.
Click to expand...
OT
Iran has no interest in conflict with Pakistan. The threats from US and KSA are enough. Think also of the wars in Iraq and Syria.
There is of course suspicion of Baluchi's in Sistan because some of them are subverted by the Armed Non Governmental Organisations from Pakistan but Iran does not in general suppress Sunni's , Christians or Jews. The country that is interested in subverting Pakistan is India. And there are of course factions in Afghanistan.
Iran is an industrial nation and Pakistan is beginning to grow into an industrial nation fast because of Chinese support so trade between Iran and Pakistan promises to become important. That is more important to Iran than a possible wish to subvert Pakistan: What would be the purpose?
 
H

[email protected]

Junior Member
Registered Member
delft said:
Iran has no interest in conflict with Pakistan.
Click to expand...
nor does Pakistan have any interest to have any conflict with Iran.
delft said:
Armed Non Governmental Organisations from Pakistan
Click to expand...
& if you have understanding the issue you must be aware that Iran itself was involve in such proxy activities in Pakistan & I am referring to the officially recorded events

Secondly before to accuse us for the presence of "Armed Non Governmental Organisations" plz keep in mind we are not responsible for the PROBLEMS of IRANIAN within her own TERRITORY; we have concluded the world most successful Anti-Terror campaign in past & currently conducting world biggest Intelligence Based Counter Terrorism Operations because of this we just few days back have eliminated most of the top leadership of ISIS in Pakistani Baluchistan
May I know what Iran has done to fight terrorism other than fighting at foreign lands like Syria, Iraq & Yemen .... ???
delft said:
What would be the purpose?
Click to expand...
Iranian great game of Middle East
in past we have ignored my incidents but because of this development it was necessary to send message in clear manner.

Now plz don't derail this thread with political discussions.
 
M

MastanKhan

Junior Member
delft said:
OT
Iran has no interest in conflict with Pakistan. The threats from US and KSA are enough. Think also of the wars in Iraq and Syria.
There is of course suspicion of Baluchi's in Sistan because some of them are subverted by the Armed Non Governmental Organisations from Pakistan but Iran does not in general suppress Sunni's , Christians or Jews. The country that is interested in subverting Pakistan is India. And there are of course factions in Afghanistan.
Iran is an industrial nation and Pakistan is beginning to grow into an industrial nation fast because of Chinese support so trade between Iran and Pakistan promises to become important. That is more important to Iran than a possible wish to subvert Pakistan: What would be the purpose?
Click to expand...

Hi,

That is incorrect---Iran will charge at baluchistan the first opportunity it gets---like in the 1965 war with india pakistan---iranian army was at the border---if pak lost---the iranian military would take over baluchistan.

Iran has ugly plans for pakistan.
 
A

Ali Qizilbash

Junior Member
Registered Member
MastanKhan said:
Hi,

That is incorrect---Iran will charge at baluchistan the first opportunity it gets---like in the 1965 war with india pakistan---iranian army was at the border---if pak lost---the iranian military would take over baluchistan.

Iran has ugly plans for pakistan.
Click to expand...

Then going by your ugly logic, why it didn't take Baluchistan in 1971 when Pak lost to India.

I am always amazed at your posts. BTW which history books you read for making this historical revelation?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top