JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread
- Thread starter crazyinsane105
- Start date
- Status
Semi-Lobster
Junior Member
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009
The RB-199 is certainly small enough and there are variants with afterburners (although their total thrust is lower than the RD-93s but they probably have a longer lifespan than Russian than Russian Turbofan engines) but like tphuang said, every indication is that Chengdu would prefer the WS-13 engine.
The RB-199 is certainly small enough and there are variants with afterburners (although their total thrust is lower than the RD-93s but they probably have a longer lifespan than Russian than Russian Turbofan engines) but like tphuang said, every indication is that Chengdu would prefer the WS-13 engine.
Last edited:
Hyperwarp
Captain
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009
Thanx for that... Got more like these for other RADARs (KLJ-6E/F, etc, etc)?
Thanx for that... Got more like these for other RADARs (KLJ-6E/F, etc, etc)?
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009
most western countries already adapting 1 meter RCS as standard measurement.
while the russian may be using old 3 meter RCS target.
assume trying to detect 1 meter target,the detection range may reduce to 70~60km.
most western countries already adapting 1 meter RCS as standard measurement.
while the russian may be using old 3 meter RCS target.
assume trying to detect 1 meter target,the detection range may reduce to 70~60km.
Last edited:
Re: JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread 2009
RB-199 like RD-33 has T:W ration 7.2~7.5 which is still impressive,which is still better than M-53
RB-199 like RD-33 has T:W ration 7.2~7.5 which is still impressive,which is still better than M-53
- Status