Re: JMSDF 16DDH Carrier Takes shape
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
Except in this case, I would addd...if it floats like a duck.
The JMSDF is putting quality vessels to sea in quantity and they have a very strong experience base. All in all, they are the second strongest destroyer Navy in the world...one that is now adding strong amphibious capabilities and sea control capabilities. Not a force to be trifled with in the least, that's for sure.
As you are fond of saying...You've raised a good point. When HMS Invincible was ordered she was still being referred to as a 'Through Deck Cruiser/ Command Cruiser' rather than a carrier and she was named after a WW1 Battlecruiser instead of recieving a carrier name. The second unit was nearly named HMS Lion but by then there was growing acceptance that the class were carriers, and the second and third units recieved carrier names (Illustrious and Indomitable, later changed to Ark Royal). The new CVFs Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales do not have traditional carrier names either, but the reasoning is again more political than naval. If the Japanese ships had recieved traditional carrier names (eg Kaga, Akagi, Hiryu, Soryu, Shokaku, Zuikaku... you get the gist) then that would have been a very unambiguous political statement about the true nature of the ships, but by taking the path they have they can emphasise the 'non carrier nature' or at least 'not a true carrier' aspect whilst giving a knowing look to those of us watching from the sidelines.
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
Except in this case, I would addd...if it floats like a duck.
The JMSDF is putting quality vessels to sea in quantity and they have a very strong experience base. All in all, they are the second strongest destroyer Navy in the world...one that is now adding strong amphibious capabilities and sea control capabilities. Not a force to be trifled with in the least, that's for sure.