Japan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Yes, that's certainly a Kongo class DDG there.
Which one?

The one up front that we can clearly see is an Atago class (In fact the 178 is the JDS Ashigara, 2nd of the Atago class). It's a little bigger than the Kongo class and has the hanger for the helos...like a US Flight IIA.

I think the 1st one behind the Carrier may be a Kongo, but cannot make out enough of the sensors on the mast to tell, because all we can see is the mast back there.
 

Verum

Junior Member
Are there any info on the successor of Atago class yet? It will be based on Flight III of Arleigh Burke for sure, which itself will start construction around 2016. Now it's already 2014, they must have already started the program. Those warships take a long time to study/absorb and then to modify.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Are there any info on the successor of Atago class yet? It will be based on Flight III of Arleigh Burke for sure, which itself will start construction around 2016. Now it's already 2014, they must have already started the program. Those warships take a long time to study/absorb and then to modify.
Well, before they go there they have already announced the building of two more Atago DDGs.

The funding for those two vessels will be in 2015 and 2016 respectively, which means they will start building in 2016 and 2017 respectively, launch in 2018 and 2019 and be commissioned in 2019 and 2020.

This will give Japan eight AEGIS class destroyers of 9,000 and 10,000 tons.

I believe the two new Atagos will essentially be very much like the two existing ones and will have whatever AEGIS upgrades for BMD and such. At that point, after 2020, the first Kongo Class DDG will be thirty years old. In that time frame we will see the successor design for those first four vessels coming forward, and I imagine it will be based on the Flight III design, particularly with the AMDR.

The one behind Hyuga class. ORQ antenna and mast fits perfectly
Right you are.

After getting home I was able to take a look more closely on my home computer with better software. Any thoughts on what the fourth vessel is? I think it may be a Takanami.
 
Last edited:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
This is one of those indicators I have talked about for Japan with respect to its Imuzo class carriers, and any follow on classes they consider.

Apparently It is being reported, that in addition to the 42 F-35A aircraft that the Japanese Ministry of Defense is basically committing too for the JSF, that they are also considering another rpurchase now to include J-35B aircraft.

IMHO, that would clench their plans to use the Izumo class and follow on carriers for carrying a squadron or two of F-35Bs.

The March 2014 Combat Air uses the USNI article by Kyle Mizokami ,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, for the information about this potential deal. That article was published earlier in United States Naval Institute News.

In that article is states:

USNI-Japan's New Defense Plan said:
Japan will acquire 28 F-35A Joint Strike Fighters during the five-year period covered by the Mid Term Defense Plan, with another 14 to follow later. Japan is considering a second F-35 purchase, possibly including the F-35B vertical takeoff and landing version for deployment on Japan’s Izumo

That article links to another article from English.news.cn,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. that says the following about this considered purchase:

English.news.cn said:
Japan's MOD is particularly eyeing two of the F-35 models for their vertical and short take off and landing ability, and officials here have said that the jet could be used along with ground troops and amphibious vehicles for rapid deployment operations to remote islands off Japan.

So, it sounds like they are considering such a purchase...which in itself is BIG news...but we cannot, based on these sources, that they have finalized such a purchase at this point.

But it sure bears watching. Because if it transpires, this is the type of thing we will see in the Western Pacific as a result of it:


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 
Last edited:

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Jeff how many flat tops will we have in Asia check this out

2 + 2 from Russia
4 from Japan
1 from South Korea
And 2 from Austrailia

9 possibly 11 flat tops from nations barring China and India and AEGIS DDG to go with them

Now if Japan builds more and South Korea does the number we are talking a lot of flat tops!!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Jeff how many flat tops will we have in Asia check this out

2 + 2 from Russia
4 from Japan
1 from South Korea
And 2 from Austrailia

9 possibly 11 flat tops from nations barring China and India and AEGIS DDG to go with them

Now if Japan builds more and South Korea does the number we are talking a lot of flat tops!!
Well, let's talk with what are absolutely confirmed plans, or vessels already in existence:

Japan will have:

2 x Izumo
2 x Hyuga
3 x Osumi

Russia will have:

2 x Vladivostok (The second 2 are not a for sure thing yet)

Korea will have:

2 x Dokdo

India will have:

1 x Vikramaditya
1 x Vikrant

Australia will have:

2 x Canberra

China will have:

1 x Liaoning
2 x Follow-on

The US will have (forward deployed/on station in the Western Pacific or Indian Ocean):

2 x Nimitz
1 x Wasp

Also, we have the one small carrier from Thailand:

1 x Naruebet


That's a total of 22 carrier or carrier type vessels in the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean areas. Lots of them.
 

Zool

Junior Member
This is one of those indicators I have talked about for Japan with respect to its Imuzo class carriers, and any follow on classes they consider.

Apparently It is being reported, that in addition to the 42 F-35A aircraft that the Japanese Ministry of Defense is basically committing too for the JSF, that they are also considering another rpurchase now to include J-35B aircraft.

I have been reading reports on internal discussions within the Japanese MOD which appear counter to this. One made public as early as last week, which indicates appropriations for the initial F-35A's are still in flux. Ironically, the "Abenomics" policies of the last couple years have compounded the issue.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Cheers,
Zool
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
I have been reading reports on internal discussions within the Japanese MOD which appear counter to this. One made public as early as last week, which indicates appropriations for the initial F-35A's are still in flux. Ironically, the "Abenomics" policies of the last couple years have compounded the issue.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Cheers,
Zool

Japan has already allocated money for the aircraft
 
Top