Look at the grass though.Considering the streak it left, I doubt it's an RC model.
Look at the grass though.Considering the streak it left, I doubt it's an RC model.
Plus the white lines on the runway look way too thick when compared to the aircraft.Look at the grass though.
Actually it's legit:Plus the white lines on the runway look way too thick when compared to the aircraft.
So the tall grass and the thick white lines were an optical illusion or something.Actually it's legit:
P-1/C-2 pair indeed look cartoonish.Might be the proportion of the plane makes it kind of look like a toy plane, with the tiny fuselage
Actually P1 looks like a damn good MPA and it's a shame it hasn't found more export success, beaten out by Boeing's P8.P-1/C-2 pair indeed look cartoonish.
Cuties!
p.s. other than from next year onwards P-1 is slated to carry up to 8 long-range ASCMs per plane.
I would have been happy if it had won the UK's MPA requirement, but given the P8's usage amongst our allies I can see in part why we went with the P8 in the end.Actually P1 looks like a damn good MPA and it's a shame it hasn't found more export success, beaten out by Boeing's P8.
Is that confirmed or still in the works?p.s. other than from next year onwards P-1 is slated to carry up to 8 long-range ASCMs per plane.
Problem for the P1 is that it requires a unique logistics and training package, whereas P8 can plug into the huge global 737 logistics and (for pilots at least) training infrastructure.I would have been happy if it had won the UK's MPA requirement, but given the P8's usage amongst our allies I can see in part why we went with the P8 in the end.
P1 is definitely a good MPA and a step up for Japan's maratime surveillance capabilities.
Is that confirmed or still in the works?
Well, both I guess?Is that confirmed or still in the works?