Japan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Equation

Lieutenant General
Problem is US could say it was "reacting to others" when it invaded Iraq a second time, and Western allies were "reacting" to others when it exceeded its UN mandate to protect Libyans from Gaddafi. So, if your position is US did whatever it please in Iraq, then you also have to say the same for China in the SCS. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

But no one is dying from military conflict or exchange of gun fire down in the SCS, unlike in Iraq where Operation Winning Hearts and Minds seems to be giving the local people more instability and violence that they wish Saddam was alive and back in power. So yeah...there is a MAJOR difference. Beside, China just wants her land back and no post WW2 status quo can "rule of law" could deny that.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
But no one is dying from military conflict or exchange of gun fire down in the SCS, unlike in Iraq where Operation Winning Hearts and Minds seems to be giving the local people more instability and violence that they wish Saddam was alive and back in power. So yeah...there is a MAJOR difference. Beside, China just wants her land back and no post WW2 status quo can "rule of law" could deny that.
Let's don't mix apples and oranges; there's great powers doing as they can, and then there's effect of their actions. The original conversation centered on the former, and from that context, my claim is China will pursue what it perceives as its national interests, just like US and other great powers in history. That is all, and I made no moral arguments for or against their actions.
 

Yvrch

Junior Member
Registered Member
Equation, .........

You logic is not historical, you say you live in Texas then the Spanish Crown should reclaim Texas as part of Spain because Spain was the first nation to discover it and you since i am sure you are not Spanish you should leave Texas, that is the same Chinese logic but i am sure you will say the Spanish logic is foolish.
In the 21st century, when you have nukes that policy is utterly doom to fail or lead to thermonuclear war, the US will remain in Asia for a long, long time, the US and China will remain each one on its side and both will have to respect the integral territorial limits of each side, and Japan only will implement the conventional part of patrolling its own territory and what they claim as their own

Your logic is definitely not historical that I can tell.
They did, and they lost it to Mexico, in a frigging war. And Mexico in turn lost it again with Texas declaring its own dependence.
I think you're barking up the wrong tree here, nothing to compare here.

======

China never relinquishes the sovereignty over her territories after WWII, Taiwan, SCS, Diaoyu, etc.
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Japan to Receive 4 New V-22 Osprey Aircraft

On July 19, the U.S. Navy awarded a $545 million contract to Bell-Boeing to manufacture and deliver four V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft to Japan,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to a Pentagon press release. The latest order is part of a $3 billion sale of 17 V-22 Osprey military transport aircraft and associated equipment to the Japan Self-Defense Force (JSDF).

In July 2015, the U.S. Navy awarded Bell-Boeing–Bell Helicopters and Boeing formed a business partnership to develop and produce the V-22—the contract to supply the first five V-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft to the JSDF via the Pentagon’s foreign military sales program. It was the V-22’s first international sale. Japan first announced its intention to procure the Osprey aircraft in November 2014.

The V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft “is a hybrid between a conventional helicopter and turboprop plane with both vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) and short takeoff and landing (STOL) capability. It outperforms traditional helicopters in terms of speed and range,” I explained in May 2016 (See:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). The JSDF will receive the V-22B Block C variant, in service with the United States Marine Corps (USMC).

A number of V-22s will be stationed aboard the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force’s new 19,5000-ton helicopter carrier
Izumo. Japan’s Ministry of Defense also announced its intention to deploy some V-22s in the East China Sea. The purchase of V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft is part of a larger push of the JSDF to improve its amphibious and naval warfare capabilities. As I reported in December 2015 (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), next to the four Ospreys, Japan will procure the following military hardware:

The fiscal year 2016/2017 shopping list encompasses 11 units of AAV7 amphibious assault vehicles made by BAE System — Japan is in the process of setting up an Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade by 2017 — 17 Mitsubishi SH-60K anti-submarine warfare helicopters, (…) three Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk drones, six F-35A Lightning II fighter planes, one Kawasaki C-2 military transport aircraft, and 36 new lighter maneuver combat vehicles (MCVs).

A 2015 press release by the U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
:

Japan is modernizing its transport fleet to better support its defense and special mission needs. The proposed sale of V-22B Block C Osprey aircraft will greatly enhance the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force’s humanitarian and disaster relief capabilities and support amphibious operations. This sale will promote burden sharing with our ally and interoperability with U.S. forces. Japan will have no difficulty absorbing these aircraft into its armed forces.

In the past, there have been repeated concerns over the reliability of the V-22 given that a number of aircraft in service with the USMC in Japan have crashed. The V-22 project
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
beset by a number of controversies right from the onset.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
For those interested here is the present stage in construction of 25DD.

CkZGpcAUoAAfheI.jpg

CkLiHL6UkAAYcwS.jpg


...
... found an update:
Japanese%2BSelf%2BDefense%2Bnavy%2B-%2B25DD%2Bclass%2Bdestroyers%2Bunder%2Bconstruction%2Bin%2BNagasaki%2B1.jpg

Japanese%2BSelf%2BDefense%2Bnavy%2B-%2B25DD%2Bclass%2Bdestroyers%2Bunder%2Bconstruction%2Bin%2BNagasaki%2B8.jpg

Japanese%2BSelf%2BDefense%2Bnavy%2B-%2B25DD%2Bclass%2Bdestroyers%2Bunder%2Bconstruction%2Bin%2BNagasaki%2B12.jpg
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
She is coming along nicely.

There will be two of these and I believe they are lighter, ASW centric versions of the Akizuki-class.

View attachment 29377
For me not centirc same but eventually only 16 cell's in VLS, last ingos they going normaly for 32 but no sure right now.
25 DD class first in service in 2019, right now i have 2 ordered, build by Mitsubishi, Nagasaki as 3 Akizuki on 4.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


If Japanese members can say but curious " only 4 " Akizuki build* and now a new less expensive seems but in fact in more if he get VLS with 32 cell's exactly to 99 % same ship, AEGIS like, same size, same armament, helo only difference design frion island with the 4 AESA radars on Akizuki 2 forward on a structure in more ugly.

Also now with last Hatsuyuki and Asagiri in service Japanese Navy need much new DDG, 13...
with a Fleet of 43 DDG/DD/Helo Carrier which get a service life of years need 1.5/year and from 2006 have received " only " 9 not sufficient for replace one by one older.

New are more expensive, capable also Japan can afford ?

Last things Akizuki or Takanami the lasts are very good for ASW clearly better as Chinese by ex coz they have SH-60J/K much more capable than little Z-9C or older Ka-27/28 in more all have VL ASROC and in number about 50 % of the cell's.

Japanese dudes :) why also fast a new class also similar ?
 
Last edited:
Top