J-35A fighter (PLAAF) + FC-31 thread

[AsuraGodFiend]

I'm getting concerned like @Tomboy about the eots cause it's make no sense for it to be covered so long while j35 eots is already revealed a while ago imo i think it's still cover cause of the parade rehearsals.

 

[Blitzo]

I'm getting concerned like @Tomboy about the eots cause it's make no sense for it to be covered so long while j35 eots is already revealed a while ago imo i think it's still cover cause of the parade but that still doesn't make all the sense when the j20 eot is uncovered in the parade rehearsals I'm very confuse.

It's really no big deal.

For a while, J-20s initially were seen with covers as well when it first entered service.

More importantly we've seen J-20A and J-20S and also J-35 with visible functional EOIRSTs installed. So the fact that the initial few production J-35A airframes do not have them doesn't matter.


There's nothing to be concerned about because there are no particular implications of any consequence.

 

[by78]

Another nice image.

 

[by78]

Belly view.

 

[The Observer]

Belly view.

Oh now it has pop-up Luneburg? Neat

 

[AsuraGodFiend]

Oh now it has pop-up Luneburg? Neat

Always had it and the j35 has non retractable one

 

[The Observer]

Always had it and the j35 has non retractable one

Well, this is J-35 isn't it? Or the Navy version is the one called J-35?

 

[dingyibvs]

Well, this is J-35 isn't it? Or the Navy version is the one called J-35?

This is the Air Force version, called the J-35A. Yes, the Navy one is called the J-35.

 

[The Observer]

This is the Air Force version, called the J-35A. Yes, the Navy one is called the J-35.

Oh ok, thanks for the clarification

 

[by78]

One more.